Development of Basketball Physical and Technical Test Instruments:  Validity and Reliability Analysis

Patriana Nurmansyah Awwaludin; Masayu Rizka Risjanna; Muhammad Naufal Abdurahman; Mona Fiametta Febrianty

doi:10.20884/1.paju.2025.7.2.17780

Patriana Nurmansyah Awwaludin 081238910193
Masayu Rizka Risjanna Program Studi Kepelatihan Fisik Olahraga, Fakultas Pendidikan Olahraga dan Kesehatan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Muhammad Naufal Abdurahman Program Studi Ilmu Keolahragaan, Fakultas Pendidikan Olahraga dan Kesehatan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Mona Fiametta Febrianty Program Studi Kepelatihan Fisik Olahraga, Fakultas Pendidikan Olahraga dan Kesehatan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.paju.2025.7.2.17780

Abstract

The development of measurement instruments for basketball skills and physical performance is essential to support athlete training programs based on systematic and data-driven approaches. Although basketball in Indonesia has grown steadily, the transition from amateur to professional levels still faces challenges, one of which is the absence of standardized measurement tools that are both valid and reliable across different stages of athlete development. This study aimed to develop and examine the validity and reliability of basketball skill and physical test instruments intended for athletes aged 12–18 years. A quantitative methodological approach was employed, focusing on content validation through expert judgment. The validation process involved ten experts in basketball and sport science who assessed the relevance of each test item. Content validity was analyzed using the Content Validity Ratio (CVR), while inter-rater reliability was examined with Fleiss’ Kappa. The results indicated that of the 11 skill test items, 7 were valid and reliable, with coefficients ranging from moderate to almost perfect. However, several items, such as passing version II, right- and left-hand dribbling, and speed dribbling shoot, were deemed invalid and showed low reliability (slight). In the physical test domain, 8 of 10 items were validated and demonstrated almost perfect reliability, while the standing long jump and hexagon test were found invalid and yielded low reliability (poor). These findings suggest that the developed instruments meet validity and reliability standards for most items, and thus hold potential as reference tools for assessing physical and technical performance in youth basketball. Furthermore, the instruments provide a foundation for future studies involving field trials to confirm their effectiveness in athlete development programs.

References

Abrar, I. I., & Fitroni, H. (2021). Pembinaan Cabang Olahraga Bola Basket Pada Usia Dibawah 20 Tahun Di Jawa Timur. Jurnal Kesehatan Olahraga , 9(4), 145–154.

Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1988). Psychological Testing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Asmawi, Mohammad, F. H. P. Yudho, I. Sina, A. Gumantan, A. Kemala, R. Iqbal, and C. R. (2022). Desain Besar Olahraga Nasional Menuju Indonesia Emas (1 ed., hal. 2022). Jejak Pustaka. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Firdaus-Hendry-

Yudho/publication/360096519_Desain_Besar_Olahraga_Nasional_Menuju_Indonesia_Emas/links/626205138cb84a40ac801c91/Desain-Besar-Olahraga-Nasional-Menuju-Indonesia-Emas.pdf

Balyi, I. (2008). Canadian Basketball: Athlete Development Model. Department of Canadian Heritage.

Balyi, I., Way, R., & Higgs, C. (2020). Long-Term Athlete Development Model. In Long-Term Athlete Development. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781492596318.ch001

Barnett, L. M., Stodden, D., Cohen, K. E., Smith, J. J., Lubans, D. R., Lenoir, M., Iivonen, S., Miller, A. D., Laukkanen,
A., Dudley, D., Lander, N. J., Brown, H., & Morgan, P. J. (2016). Fundamental movement skills: An important focus. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 35(3), 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2014-0209

Bompa, T. O., & Buzzichelli, C. A. (2015). Periodization Training for Sports, 3e. Human Kinetics.
Cormack, S. J., Newton, R. U., McGulgan, M. R., & Doyle, T. L. A. (2008). Reliability of measures obtained during single and repeated countermovement jumps. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 3(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.3.2.131

Drinkwater, E. J., Pyne, D. B., & McKenna, M. J. (2008). Design and interpretation of anthropometric and fitness testing of basketball players. In Sports Medicine (Vol. 38, Nomor 7). https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200838070-00004

Fox, J. L., Scanlan, A. T., & Stanton, R. (2017). A Review of Player Monitoring Approaches in Basketball: Current Trends and Future Directions. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 31(7), 2021–2029. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001964

Hoffman, J. (2014). Physiological Aspects of Sport Training and Performance (Second Edi). University of Central Florida.

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). Landis amd Koch1977_agreement of categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.

Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity”.Personnel Psychology. Personnel Psychology, 28, 563–575.

Mancha-triguero, D., García-rubio, J., Calleja-gonzález, J., & Ibáñez, S. J. (2019). Physical fitness in basketball players : a systematic review. 59(0). https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.19.09180-1

Memmert, D., & Harvey, S. (2008). The Game Performance Assessment Instrument (GPAI): Some concerns and solutions for further development. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27(2), 220–240. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.27.2.220

Pauole, K., Madole, K., Garhammer, J., Lacourse, M., & Rozenek, R. (2000). Reliability and validity of the T-test as a measure of agility, leg power, and leg speed in college-aged men and women Fiabilite et validite du T-test comme mesure de l ’ agilite, de la puissance et de la vitesse de la jambe chez des garcons et des filles. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 14(4), 443–450.

Tanner, R. K., & Gore, C. J. (2013). Physiological tests for Elite Athletes 2nd Edition. In Physiologial tests for Elite Athletes.