Beyond the Reader, Towards the Player: Reconceptualizing the Reader-Response Theory through Video-Games

Rachid Benharrousse

doi:10.20884/1.jes.2022.3.2.6945

Rachid Benharrousse Mohammed V University in Rabat

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jes.2022.3.2.6945

Abstract

The reader-response theory valorized the reader; without the latter, the text did not exist and had no meaning. The reader is deemed as an interpreter of an already rigid text. This theoretical limitation is evidenced in the understanding of the player in video-games. The scholarship equates the player to the reader in their passivity. The players, through playing, are not the object of the process of signification. They constitute their narratives across video-game categories. Role-playing reinforces the player’s identification within the game world beyond mere interpretation. The player’s lived experience is no longer separated from role-playing. Lived experience is intertwined with the gaming experience, which establishes double-faceted contextualization; the player’s lived experience shapes their gaming choices and vice versa. Hence, the players are not confined to being passive interpreters of an already assigned narrative; instead, they constitute their narratives, live within the game, and experience their video-games.

References

Atkins, B. (2003). More Than a Game: The Computer Game as Fictional Form. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Bartle, R. (2004). Designing Virtual Worlds. London: New Riders.

Benharrousse, R. (2019). Digital Poetry and the Transcendence of Print Poetry’s Boundaries: Interactivity and the Reader. Munich: Verlag Publications.

Bogost, I. (2008). The Rhetoric of Video-Games. In K. Salen (Ed.), The Ecology of Games: Connecting Youth, Games, and Learning (pp. 117-140). New York: The MIT Press.

Cannizzo, A., Ramirez, E. (2015). Towards Procedural Map and Character Generation for the MOBA Game Genre. Ingenieria y Ciencia, 11(22): 95-119.

Chávez, D. (2010). El coronel no tiene con quien jugar: Representaciones latinoamericanas en la literatura y el videojuego. Arizona Journal of Hispanic Cultural Studies, 1(14): 159–176.

Culler, J. (2002). Structuralist poetics: Structuralism, linguistics and the study of literature. London: Routledge.

de Wildt, L. (2014). Precarious Play. Press Start, 1(1): 1-20.

Dovey, J., Kennedy, H. (2007). From Margin to Center: Biographies of Technicity and the Construction of Hegemonic Games Culture. In J. P. Williams & J. H. Smith (Eds.), The Players’ Realm: Studies on the Culture of Video-Games and Gaming (pp. 131–153). New York: McFarland & Co.

Fish, S. (1980). Is There a Text in This Class?. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Fowler, R. M. (2001). Let the Reader Understand: Reader-Response Criticism and the Gospel of Mark. New York: Trinity Press International.

Gee, J. P. (2003). What video-games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Entertainment, 1(1): 20-20.

Grieve, R., March, E., & Van Doorn, G. (2019). Masculinity might be more toxic than we think: The influence of gender roles on trait emotional manipulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 138: 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.042.

Kneer, J., Franken, S., & Reich, S. (2019). Not only for the (tom) boys: Gender variables as predictors for playing motivations, passion, and addiction for MMORPGs. Simulation & Gaming, 50(1): 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878118823033

McMahan, A. (2003). Immersion, Engagement, and Presence: A Method for Analyzing 3-D Video-Games. In M. J. P. Wolf & B. Perron (Eds.), The Video-Game Theory Reader, (pp. 67-85). London: Routledge.

New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1): 60–92.

Ong, F., Vorobjovas-Pinta, O., & Lewis, C. (2020). LGBTIQ+ identities in tourism and leisure research: A systematic qualitative literature review. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 30(7): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1828430

Ostenson, J. (2013). Exploring the Boundaries of Narrative: Video-Games in the English Classroom. The English Journal, 102(6): 71–78.

Penix-Tadsen, P. (2013). Latin American Ludology; Why we should Take Video-Games Seriously (and when we shouldn’t). Latin American Research Review, 48(1): 174-190.

Rehak, B. (2003). Playing at Being: Psychoanalysis and Avatar. In M. J. P. Wolf & B. Perron (Eds.), The Video-Game Theory Reader, (pp. 103-127). London: Routledge.

Reich, S. (2021). A systematic gender perspective on entertainment theory. In P. Vorderer & C. Klimmt (Eds.), The oxford handbook of entertainment theory (pp. 81–102). Oxford University Press.

Rosenblatt, L. (1995) Literature as Exploration. New York: MLA.

Rosenblatt, L. (2005) Making Meaning with Texts: Selected Essays. London: Heinemann.

Ryan, M. (2009). From Narrative Games to Playable Stories: Toward a Poetics of Interactive Narrative. Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies, 1(1): 43-59.

Ryan, M. (2001). Narrative as Virtual Reality: Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media. Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Salen, K., Zimmerman, E. (2003). Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Seldon, R, et al.. (eds.). (2005). A Reader’s Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory. London: Pearson Education Limited.

Suduiko, A. (2 May 2017) ‘Video-Games Are Better without Stories’: A Reply. With A Terrible Fate.

Tavinor, G. (2011). Response to Plunkett: On Place Attachment in Virtual Worlds. World Leisure Journal, 53(3): 179–185.

Wolf, M. J. P. (2002). The Medium of the Video-Game. Texas: University of Texas Press