‘Can We See It?’: Contextualizing ‘Deforestation’ from an English-Medium Science Textbook for a Primary School Level
Abstract
Understanding an English-medium science textbook is possibly challenging for some students. It is, for example, due to the language used. To deal with this issue, construing the use of the other mode, such as visual images, along with the verbal text is regarded useful. Thereby, the construal of multimodality in an English-medium science textbook becomes crucial. Albeit a myriad of inspections on multimodality exists, but to the best of the writer’s knowledge, such investigation with respect to an English-medium science textbook, particularly at a primary school level, was found to be limited. Therefore, this study aimed to scrutinize the verbal text and visual image presented in a science textbook used for a primary school level which is presented in English. To that end, a descriptive research design was employed. In this regard, a systemic functional multimodal discourse analysis (SF-MDA) within the trinocular metafunctions encompassing ideational, interpersonal, and textual metafunctions was utilized. The systemic functional linguistics theory, the grammar of visual design, intersemiotic complementarity, and logico-semantics were the frameworks employed to analyze the artefact, the English-medium science textbook. The findings revealed that the visual image and verbal text interact with one another within the three metafunctions. Given the interaction between the two modes, the present study suggests that both teachers and students are required to take into considerations and be aware of the potential or roles of images along with the verbal text, i.e. the images are not merely accessories, but instead, these are able to assist the comprehension of the science materials learned.
References
Baker, W., & Ishikawa, T. (2021). Transcultural communication through global Englishes. In Transcultural Communication Through Global Englishes. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367809973
Bigelow, M., & Collins, P. (2019). Bilingualism from Childhood through adolescene. In A. De Houwer & L. Ortega (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of bilingualism (pp. 36–58). Cambridge University Press.
Butt, D., Fahey, R., Feez, S., Spinks, S., & Yallop, C. (2003). Using functional grammar: An explorer’s guide. Macquarie University Sydney.
Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D. (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt011
Cystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd Ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-32505-1
Doran, Y. J. (2019). Building knowledge through images in physics. Visual Communication, 18(2), 251–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357218759825
Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). Continuum.
Emilia, E. (2014). Introducing functional grammar. Pustaka Jaya.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
Fang, Z. (2004). Scientific literacy: A systemic functional linguistics perspective. Science Education, 89(2), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20050
Fernandez-Fontecha, A., O’Halloran, K. L., Wignell, P., & Tan, S. (2020). Scaffolding CLIL in the science classroom via visual thinking: A systemic functional multimodal approach. Linguistics and Education, 55.
Fredlund, T., Remmen, K. B., & Knain, E. (2021). The epistemological commitments of modes: opportunities and challenges for science learning. Visual Communication, 0(0), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572211038991
Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1994). Making sense of functional grammar. Gerd Stabler. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110289039.545
Gunawan, W. (2020). Systemic functional linguistics (SFL) and teacher education in EFL context. UPI Press.
Guo, L. (2004). Multimodality in a biology textbook. In K. L. O’Halloran (Ed.), Multimodal Discourse Analysis (pp. 196–219). Continuum.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: the social interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold Ltd.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Edward Arnold Ltd.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthienssen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). Hodder Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthienssen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. (2004). The language of science (J. J. Webster (ed.)). Continuum.
Hermawan, B., & Rahyono, F. X. (2019). Ideational meanings of science and interpersonal position of readers in science textbooks for basic level in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i1.15932
Hermawan, B., & Sukyadi, D. (2020). Analisis multimodal pada buku teks Sains. UPI Press.
Jauhara, D., Emilia, E., & Lukmana, I. (2021). Re-contextualising ‘Greeting’: A multimodal analysis in an EFL textbook. Indonesian Journal of Functional Linguistics, 1(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17509/ijsfl.v1i1.32621
Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., & O’Halloran, K. (2016). Introducing multimodality. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315638027
Knox, J. S. (2013). Multimodality and systemic functional analysis. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0836
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2021). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2009). Immersion and CLIL in English: More differences than similarities. ELT Journal, 64(4), 367–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp082
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. In Mathematical Subjects: Children Talk About Their Mathematics Lives. Greenwood Press.
Leng, H. P., & Fairclough, L. (2017). Science: Pupil’s book 4. Marshall Cavendish Education Pte Ltd.
Lynch, M. (1988). The externalized retina: Selection and mathematization in the visual documentation of objects
in the life sciences. In Michael Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 153–186). MIT Press.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. Continuum.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. Equinox Publishing Ltd.
Martinec, R., & Salway, A. (2005). A system for image–text relations in new (and old) media. Visual Communication, 4(3), 337–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357205055928
Meneses, A., Escobar, J., & Véliz, S. (2018). The effects of multimodal texts on science reading comprehension in Chilean fifth-graders : Text scaffolding and comprehension skills. International Journal of Science Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1527472
Morton, J. L. (2021). The meanings of colors: Color matters. https://www.colormatters.com/color-symbolism/the-meanings-of-colors
Muspratt, S., & Freebody, P. (2013). Critical analysis of Science textbooks. In Critical analysis of Science textbooks (pp. 33–59). Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4168-3
Nur’graha, D. Z. M., & Hermawan, B. (2020). What do the pictures say in a science textbook ? 4th International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2020), 509(Icollite), 164–171.
O’Halloran, K., & Fei, V. L. (2014). Systemic functional multimodal discourse analysis. In S. Norris & C. D. Maier (Eds.), Interactions, images, and text: A reader in multimodality (pp. 137–154). Walter de Gruyter, Inc.
Royce, T. D. (1998). Synergy on the Page: Exploring intersemiotic complementarity in page-based multimodal text. In JASFL Occasional Papers (Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 25–49).
Royce, T. D. (2007). Intersemiotic complementarity: A framework for multimodal discourse analysis. New Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse, 63–109. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203357774
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2008). The language of schooling: A functional linguistic perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Sugianto, A., Andriyani, D., & Prasetyo, I. A. (2021). The visual-verbal text interrelation: Lessons from the ideational meanings of a phonics material in a primary level EFL textbook. EnJourMe (English Journal of Merdeka) : Culture, Language, and Teaching of English, 6(1).
Sugianto, A., Denarti, R., & Agung, I. (2021). Uncovering the anti-Islamic sentiment in The New Yorker cover issued on July 21 , 2008: A semiotic analysis. International Journal of English Linguistics, Literature, and Education (IJELLE), 3(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/doi :10.32585/ijelle.v3i1.1450
Sugianto, A., Prasetyo, I. A., Aria, D., & Wahjuwibowo, I. S. (2022). Demystifying the hegemony of the English language: Scrutiny of ‘Gak Bisa Bahasa Inggris!’ advertisement within a semiotics lens. Elsya: Journal of English Language Studies, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v4i2.7582
Sugianto, A., & Prastika, M. A. (2021). ‘Are they merely pictures?’: Delineating the images represented in acrostic poems of a primary school level EFL textbook. IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application), 4(3), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.v4i3.5834
Thompson, G. (2014). Introducing functional grammar (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Torres, G. (2015). ‘Reading’ World Link: A visual social semiotic analysis of an EFL textbook. International Journal of English Language Education, 3(1), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v3i1.7200
Unsworth, L. (2006). Towards a 3D digital multimodal curriculum for the upper primary school. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 5(1), 55–76
By submitting the manuscript, the author(s) agreed to these following terms:
(1) The copyright of received articles shall be assigned to J-Lalite: Journal of English Studies as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish articles in various forms (including reprint). J-Lalite: Journal of English Studies maintain the publishing rights to the published articles.
(2) Author(s) are permitted to disseminate published articles by sharing the link/DOI of the article at J-Lalite: Journal of English Studies. Author(s) are allowed to use their articles for any legal purposes deemed necessary without written permission from J-Lalite: Journal of English Studies with an acknowledgement of initial publication to this journal.
(3) Authors should sign a copyright transfer agreement when they have approved the final proofs sent by J-Lalite: Journal of English Studies prior to the publication.
(4) User/public use of this website will be licensed to Creative Commons Attribution-ShareALike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
