Speech Functions Realized by the First Speakers of an English Debate Competition
Abstract
Debate is a form of argument or discussion of a particular issue and it usually involves two or more speakers who express different views from each other. In a debate, speakers produce meaningful string of words to express their opinions and the words they produce may contain speech functions. The focus of this study is the speech functions realized by the first speakers in a debate competition. The debate being studied refers to a competition called Indonesian Varsity English Debate (IVED), a national debate competition held in Universitas Jenderal Soedirman. The objectives of this study are to find out the speech function choices realized by both the first speakers of the affirmative and the negative teams; and to see how the use of speech functions contributes to the development of argumentation in the debate. The data was taken from an English debate competition, i.e. the final round of IVED, which was recorded on a video compact disk. The qualitative method was conducted, and the speech functions were categorized based on the network of speech function developed by Suzanne Eggins and Diana Slade (1997). The results of this study show that the speech functions realized by the first speaker of the affirmative team are opening and continuing speech functions. The speakers of the negative team, by contrast, realized opening, continuing, and reacting speech functions because they needed to issue rebuttals of the affirmative arguments.
References
D’Cruz, Ray. 2003. The Australia-Asia Debating Guide. An online publication by the Australian Debating Federation.
Eggins, S. (1994). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguictics. London: Printer Publishers Ltd.
Eggins, S. and D. Slade. (1997). Analyzing Casual Conversation. London: Cassel.
Ericson, Jon M., James J. Murphy, Raymond Bud Zeuschner. (2003). The Debater’s Guide. An electronic publication on www.amazon.com. Accessed on June 2011.
Fiske, J. 1990. Introduction to Communication Studies. London: Routledge.
Meany, John and Kate Shuster. (2003). On That Point: An Introduction to Parliamentary Debate. An electronic publication on www.amazon.com. Accessed on June 2011.
Miles, M.B. and A.M. Huberman. 1984. Qualitatives Data Analysis: A sourcebook of New Methods. California: Sage Publications, Inc.
Nofsinger, Robert E. (1991). Everyday Conversation. Illinois: Waveland Press, Inc.
Quinn, Simon. (2005). Debating. An electronic publication on www.learningdebating.com
Silverman, David. 2000. Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
By submitting the manuscript, the author(s) agreed to these following terms:
(1) The copyright of received articles shall be assigned to J-Lalite: Journal of English Studies as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish articles in various forms (including reprint). J-Lalite: Journal of English Studies maintain the publishing rights to the published articles.
(2) Author(s) are permitted to disseminate published articles by sharing the link/DOI of the article at J-Lalite: Journal of English Studies. Author(s) are allowed to use their articles for any legal purposes deemed necessary without written permission from J-Lalite: Journal of English Studies with an acknowledgement of initial publication to this journal.
(3) Authors should sign a copyright transfer agreement when they have approved the final proofs sent by J-Lalite: Journal of English Studies prior to the publication.
(4) User/public use of this website will be licensed to Creative Commons Attribution-ShareALike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License.