Reflection of Ideology: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Donald Trump’s Declaration Speech of Jerusalem as Capital City of Israel

  • Widyo Andana Pradiptha Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
  • Tuti Purwati Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
  • Chusni Hadiati Universitas Jenderal Soedirman


This research focuses on the legitimacy of Donald Trump’s speech in declaring Jerusalem as the capital city of Israel on December 2017. This research aims to: (1) identify the text structure of the speech, (2) describe the social cognition of this speech, (3) and to reveal the social context of this speech. The compiled data is analyzed by using Van Dijk’s CDA theory of socio-cognitive (1988). This theory has interrelated three dimensions of analysis consisting of text structure, social cognition, and social context. The method of this research is qualitative by using the descriptive analysis. The data source of this research is the speech text of Donald Trump declaration speech of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital on December 2017. The result of this research shows that there is semantic aspect (microstructure) used by Donald Trump: Background (7), Detail (4), and Presupposition (15). From the analysis, the researcher argues that Donald Trump tends to be pro-Israel. This is supported in the structure of the text by how it consistently uses direct language to influence the emotional attachment of the intended by using logical facts and emotional involvement to make negative out-group representations to get positive representations to them and their allies. Furthermore, social cognition reveals the ideology and partisanship of Donald Trump about this conflict. It can be identified clearly by correlating the context of this speech to something that related to Israel-Palestine conflict. In social cognition, as the president of the United States of America, Donald Trump has a massive influence to the international world, even though it caused pros and contras for all elements of society. Possible further research about critical discourse analysis can be conducted by analyzing other issues. In short, it is also a suggestion to the other researchers to investigate more variation data such as news, advertisement, movie, and so on


Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian, Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (edisi revisi). Jakarta: PT. Adi Mahasatyma

Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. United States of America: SAGE.

Dijk, T. A. (1980). Macrostructures: An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction, and Cognition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers

. (1988). News as Discourse. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

. (1995). “Aim of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Japan Discourse vol. 1 p. 17-27

. (1996). Text and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis.
London: SAGE.

. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: SAGE

. (2001). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

. (2004). Text and Context of Parliamentary Debates, in P. Bayley (ed.) Cross-cultural Perspective on Parliamentary Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

. (2006). Discourse, Context, and Cognition. London: SAGE.

. (2008). Discourse and Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Eriyanto. (2001). Analisis Wacana Pengantar Teks Media. Yogyakarta: LkiS. Fairclough, Norman. (2001). Language and Power. London: Longman

Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. In T. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction Vol. 2. London: Sage.

Giddens, Anthony. (2006). Sociology 5th Edition. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Head, Brian William (1985). Ideology and Social Science: Destutt de Tracy and French Liberalism. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff

Hendrikus, P. Dori Wuwur. (1991). Retorika: Terampil Berpidato, Berdiskusi, Berargumentasi, Bernegosiasi. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Higgot, R., & Proud, V. (2017). IFA Edition Culture and Foreign Policy: Populist-Nationalism and Foreign Policy (Cultural Diplomacy, International Interaction and Resilience). Stuttgart: IFA (Institut für Auslandsbeziehungen).

Hornby, A.S. (2010). Oxford Advanced Learner‟s Dictionary of International Student Edition. 8th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Pennycook, Alastair. (1997). Critical Applied Linguistics and Education. Sydney: Springer Science+Business Media LLC.

Renkema, Jan. (2004). Introduction to Discourse Studies. Philadelphia, PA, USA: John Benjamin‟s Publishing Company.

Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sulfiyani. (2014). The Study of the Jakarta Post‟s Tendency inf Reporting Israel – Palestine Conflict on November 20th 2012: A study of Critical Discourse Analysis. Purwokerto: Faculty of Social and Politic Jenderal Soedirman University.

Yule, George. (1996). The Study of Language: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Internet Sources
Article entitled “In the Trump Era, Evangelicals Take Center Stage on Israel Policy”, retrieved from house/trump-era-evangelicals-take-center-stage-israel-policy-n99432., Tuesday, 2nd January 2020; 11:17 a.m.

Article entitled “What makes Jerusalem so Holy?”, retrieved from, Tuesday, 14th January 2020; 01:23 p.m.

Impasse at Camp David: the Overview; Clinton Ends Deadlocks Peace Talks, retrieved from camp-david-the-overview-clinton-ends-deadlocked-peace-talks.html, Friday, 26th July, 2019; 08:27 p.m.

Noam Chomsky: The Israel-Palestine conflict (video), retrieved from, Wednesday, 12th July 2019; 10:20 p.m.
How to Cite
PRADIPTHA, Widyo Andana; PURWATI, Tuti; HADIATI, Chusni. Reflection of Ideology: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Donald Trump’s Declaration Speech of Jerusalem as Capital City of Israel. J-Lalite: Journal of English Studies, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 22-34, june 2020. ISSN 2723-357X. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 30 may 2024. doi: