Unveiling Movie Dialogue through Speech Acts: A Pragmatic Analysis of Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom
Abstract
This study investigates the use of speech acts in cinematic dialogue, focusing on the 2023 film Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach, the research categorized 137 speech acts based on Searle’s taxonomy: representatives, directives, expressives, commissives, and declaratives. The findings revealed that representative acts were dominant in the dialogue (60.58%), followed by directives (24.82%), expressives (8.03%), commissives (4.38%), and declaratives (2.19%). These results indicate that cinematic narratives heavily rely on exposition, action-driven communication, emotional engagement, relational commitments, and performative declarations to construct character development and advance the storyline. The analysis highlights the strategic use of speech acts to reflect character intentions and social dynamics within the film. By extending speech act theory into cinematic discourse, this study contributes to the growing field of media pragmatics. It suggests the pedagogical potential of film dialogues as authentic material for teaching pragmatic competence in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) contexts. While the study was limited to a single film and excluded multimodal elements, it provided a foundation for further research integrating verbal and nonverbal aspects of communication across diverse media genres. Overall, the findings affirm the importance of pragmatic analysis in understanding contemporary narrative media and open new pathways for interdisciplinary exploration between linguistics, media studies, and language education.
References
Acheoah, J. E. (2017). Searle’s Speech Act Theory: An Integrative Appraisal. American Research Journal of English and Literature (ARJEL), 1, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21694/2378-9026.17002
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839429693-021
Chen, A. (2023). Be a good speaker in livestream shopping: A speech act theory perspective. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2023.101301
Chepinchikj, N., & Thompson, C. (2016). Analysing cinematic discourse using conversation analysis. Discourse, Context & Media, 14, 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DCM.2016.09.001
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design; Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications Ltd. http://fe.unj.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Research-Design_Qualitative-Quantitative-and-Mixed-Methods-Approaches.pdf
Dey, M. D. (2023). Four Main Characteristics of English Pragmatics. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 26(2), 510–519. https://doi.org/10.24071/LLT.V26I2.6202
Hidayat, A. (2016). Speech Acts: Force Behind Words. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.24042/ee-jtbi.v9i1.415
Husna, A., Rahman, A., & Abduh, A. (2022). Analysis of Speech Acts Used by EFL Teachers in Class Interaction: A Case Study at High School Bosowa Makassar. PINISI: Journal of Art, Humanity and Social Studies, 2(5).
Jegede, O. O. (2025). Speech Acts in the Digital Sphere: A Corpus-Based Exploration of Interactional Dynamics on Social Media Platforms. Corpus-Based Studies across Humanities, 2(2), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1515/CSH-2024-0023
Kress, G., & Theo, V. L. (2020). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (3rd editio). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003099857
Leech, G., & Thomas, J. (2002). Language, Meaning and Context: Pragmatics. In An Encyclopedia of Language. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203403617-7
Mcnally, L. (2013). Semantics and pragmatics. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4(3), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/WCS.1227,
Munir, E., & Yavuz, M. A. (2024). Study of pragmatic analysis of literature on the development of ELT students’ receptive and productive skills: A case of North Cyprus. Heliyon, 10(21), e39558. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2024.E39558
Muttaqin, U., Yulianita, N. G., & Yulianti, U. hares. (2020). Speech Acts and Its Translation Accuracy in Bilingual Fables. J-Lalite: Journal of English Studies, 1(2), 161–171. https://jos.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/jes/article/view/3621/2002
Rahardi, R. K. (2023). Pseudo-directive speech act in the javanese language: Culture-specific pragmatic perspective. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 66(12), 5036–5047. https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00223
Rahim, A. (2022). Analysis of the Use of Locutionary, Illocutionary, and Perlocutionary Speech Acts in Indonesian Language Learning at Senior High Schools. INFOKUM, 10(02), 1370–1375. https://infor.seaninstitute.org/index.php/infokum/article/view/1277
Ren, W. (2024). Translanguaging in self-praise on Chinese social media. Applied Linguistics Review, 15(1), 355–376. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2021-0169
Ridwan, A., Tajuddin, S., & Leiliyanti, E. (2023). A Discourse-Pragmatic Study of Lecturer and Student Conversations in English Literature Course. International Journal of Social Science, Education, Communication and Economics, 2(3), 729–738. https://doi.org/10.54443/SJ.V2I3.176
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1979). A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts. University of California.
Seok, S. (2022). Cultural Differences in Indirect Speech Act Use and Politeness in Human-Robot Interaction. ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 2022, 470–477. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889576
Stevani, M., Karisma, ✉, Tarigan, E., Sawalmeh, H., Yun, F., & Ginting, A. (2023). A Case Study of Locutionary, Illocutionary, and Perlocutionary Speech Acts in English Learning Interactions in Junior High School. Journal of World Englishes and Educational Practices , 5(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.32996/JWEEP.2022.5.1.5
Syathroh, I. L., Fayza Aulia, M., & Syathroh, L. (2023). Analysis of Speech Acts in Conversations Between Characters in the Film “Good Will Hunting (1997).” TLEMC (Teaching and Learning English in Multicultural Contexts), 7(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.37058/TLEMC.V7I2.9413
Tomasello, R. (2023). Linguistic signs in action: The neuropragmatics of speech acts. Brain and Language, 236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2022.105203
Widyasari, K. M., Sukarini, N. W., & Maharani, S. A. I. (2024). Illocutionary Acts Performed by Meilin in “Turning Red” the Movie. Apollo Project: Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Sastra Inggris, 13(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.34010/APOLLO.V13I1.9675
Wijana, I. D. P. (1996). Dasar-Dasar Pragmatik. Andi Offset.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
By submitting the manuscript, the author(s) agreed to these following terms:
(1) The copyright of received articles shall be assigned to J-Lalite: Journal of English Studies as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish articles in various forms (including reprint). J-Lalite: Journal of English Studies maintain the publishing rights to the published articles.
(2) Author(s) are permitted to disseminate published articles by sharing the link/DOI of the article at J-Lalite: Journal of English Studies. Author(s) are allowed to use their articles for any legal purposes deemed necessary without written permission from J-Lalite: Journal of English Studies with an acknowledgement of initial publication to this journal.
(3) Authors should sign a copyright transfer agreement when they have approved the final proofs sent by J-Lalite: Journal of English Studies prior to the publication.
(4) User/public use of this website will be licensed to Creative Commons Attribution-ShareALike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
