Humor through Exploitation of Meaning Duality in English Memes
Abstract
There are many mechanisms to integrate humor in English memes. One common method is to make incongruity through two different interpretations. The incongruity can be implemented on different levels, such as lexical, syntactic, and more. However, not everyone can understand these levels; thus, the delivery of humor is not achievable. Therefore, this study aims to analyze meaning duality causing humor in English memes. There were 30 data collected from Pinterest through documentation method. The analysis was conducted with content analysis method through descriptive-mixed approach based on theories of incongruity, ambiguity, context of situation, and generative transformation. The result shows that all types of ambiguity is found and can create meaning duality that causes humor from incongruous finishing text. Lexical ambiguity is the dominant type of meaning duality causing humor. This study also found that one meme can contain two ambiguities. Among the five types of ambiguity, this study found a different characteristic of humor for pragmatic ambiguity. These findings can help unveil how humans play with English to create humor.
References
Azim, R., Handoyo, R. P., & Yulianita, N. G. (2023). Subtitling Strategies and Acceptability of Humour in “Modern
Family” Season 6 (2014). J-Lalite: Journal of English Studies, 4(2), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jes.2023.4.2.9460
Bao, X. (2016). An Analysis of English Verbal Humor Based on Language Memes. English Language and Literature Studies, 6(2), 141–145. https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v6n2p141
Bergson, H. (2003). Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic. New York: Dover Publications.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1985). Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in the Social Semiotic Perspective. Victoria: Deakin University.
Haryadi, D., Rejeki, S., & Setyowati, A. (2022). Lexical Ambiguity as a Source of Humour: The Case of Memes on Instagram. Journal Albion: Journal of English Literature, Language, and Culture, 4(2), 67–71. Retrieved from https://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/albion/article/view/6358
Martin, R. A. (2007). The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach. Burlington: Elsevier Academic.
Nijholt, A. (2018). “All the world’s a stage”: incongruity humour revisited. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 88(5–6), 405–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-018-9609-7
Perlmutter, D. D. (2002). On incongruities and logical inconsistencies in humor: The delicate balance. Humor - International Journal of Humor Research, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2002.009
Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Ruch, Wilibald. (2008). Psychology of Humor. In The Primer of Humor Research (pp. 17–100). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ruch, Willibald. (1993). Exhilaration and Humor. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), The Handbook of Emotion (pp. 605–616). New york: Guilford.
Shifman, L. (2012). An anatomy of a YouTube meme. New Media & Society, 14(2), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811412160
Sukardi, M. I., Sumarlam, & Marmanto, S. (2017). Deviation of Meanings with Homonymy as an Effort to Build Humor in Meme: A Semantic Study. Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature, 18(1), 131–148.
Tannen, D. (1979). Processes and Consequences of Conversational Style (PhD Dissertation). University of Berkeley, Berkeley.
Yolanda, N. A. Y. Y., Bram, B., Ardi, P., & Doborovich, A. N. (2023). Lexical, Referential and Syntactic Ambiguities as Internet Jokes. RESEARCH RESULT Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 129–155. https://doi.org/10.18413/2313-8912-2023-9-2-0-7

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
By submitting the manuscript, the author(s) agreed to these following terms:
(1) The copyright of received articles shall be assigned to J-Lalite: Journal of English Studies as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish articles in various forms (including reprint). J-Lalite: Journal of English Studies maintain the publishing rights to the published articles.
(2) Author(s) are permitted to disseminate published articles by sharing the link/DOI of the article at J-Lalite: Journal of English Studies. Author(s) are allowed to use their articles for any legal purposes deemed necessary without written permission from J-Lalite: Journal of English Studies with an acknowledgement of initial publication to this journal.
(3) Authors should sign a copyright transfer agreement when they have approved the final proofs sent by J-Lalite: Journal of English Studies prior to the publication.
(4) User/public use of this website will be licensed to Creative Commons Attribution-ShareALike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License.