The Living Law in Judicial Decisions: Formulation and Implications of the National Criminal Code

  • Rian Sulistio
  • I Nyoman Nurjaya Universitas Brawijaya
  • Abdul Madjid Universitas Brawijaya

Abstract

A good law is a law that is in accordance with the law that lives in the community (living law) and in accordance with the reflection of the values prevailing in the community. In its development, living law has been accommodated in Article 2 paragraph (1) of the National Criminal Code. This research analyzes the formulation of living law provisions in the community in the National Criminal Code and its implications for Judges in making legal considerations in their decisions. This research uses normative juridical research method with statutory, historical, conceptual, analytical, and case approaches. The results showed that the formulation of Laws Living in Society in the National Criminal Code contained 15 provisions with five variations of terms such as “laws living in society”, “norms of decency”, “values of law and justice”, “local customary obligations”, and “fulfillment of customary obligations”, then the implications of laws living in society in the National Criminal Code have consequences for Judges can be a reference for adjudicating cases involving customary law and additional legal considerations. Although there are no Government Regulations and Regional Regulations regarding laws that live in the community, Judges are still obliged to explore legal values and a sense of justice that live in the community.

References

Ali Aridi, and Yana Sukma Permana. “Kedudukan Hukum Adat Dalam Penguatan Pelestarian Nilai-Nilai Adat Dalam Yurisprudensi.” The Juris 6, no. 2 (December 2022): 352–62. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v6i2.602.
Arake, Lukman, Ma’adul Yaqien Makkarateng, Kurniati Abidin, Elviana Baharuddin, and Muhammad Yusuf. “Non-Binary Gender in Siyasah Syar’iyah Perspective: Study at Religious Universities in South Sulawesi.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 7, no. 3 (October 2023): 1708. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i3.20152.
Ardiansyah, Deri, Rayhan Dwi Kurnia, and Rika Rahayu. “Formulasi RPP Pelaksanaan Pidana Adat Sebagai Upaya Harmonisasi Penerapan Hukum Adat Guna Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum.” WICARANA 3, no. 1 (March 29, 2024): 11–22. https://doi.org/10.57123/wicarana.v3i1.64.
Arief, Barda Nawawi. “Masalah Penegakan Hukum Dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan.” Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2018.
Ehrlich, Eugen. Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. Edited by Walter Lewis Moll. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1936.
Flambonita, Suci. “The Concept of Legal Pluralism in Indonesia in the New Social Movement.” Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi 10, no. 3 (July 2021): 361–73. https://doi.org/10.20961/jas.v10i0.45939.
Helnawaty, Helnawaty. “Hukum Pidana Adat Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional.” Binamulia Hukum 6, no. 2 (December 2017): 149–60. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v6i2.79.
Hiariej, Eddy, and Topo Santoso. Anotasi KUHP Nasional. Depok: Rajawali Press, 2025.
Institute for Criminal Justice Reform (ICJR). “Ketentuan Hukum Yang Hidup Dalam Masyarakat Di RKUHP Ancam Hak Warga Negara,” 2019. https://icjr.or.id/ketentuan-hukum-yang-hidup-dalam-masyarakat-di-rkuhp-ancam-hak-warga-negara/.
Irawan, Ade, and Margo Hadi Pura. “Analisis Yuridis Ketentuan Hukum Yang Hidup Dalam Masyarakat Pada Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 7, no. 1 (June 2023): 59–74. https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v7i1.6453.
Irwansyah, and Ahsan Yunus. Penelitian Hukum Pilihan Metode Dan Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media, 2022.
Kridasakti, Sri Wahyu, Abd. Majid, and Henny Yuningsih. “Restorative Justice Tindak Pidana ‘Elopement’ Hukum Adat Dalam Konstruksi Hukum Pidana Positif Indonesia.” Jurnal Supremasi 12, no. 2 (September 2022): 94–110. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v12i2.1839.
Kusyandi, Adi, Sahda Salsabila, and Murtiningsih Murtiningsih. “Kedudukan Hukum Pidana Adat Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” Yustitia 9, no. 2 (2023): 74–83. https://doi.org/10.31943/yustitia.v10i2.205.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2008.
Mulyadi, Lilik. Hukum Pidana Adat : Kajian Asas, Teori, Norma, Praktik, Dan Prosedur. Bandung: Alumni, 2015.
Pengadilan Negeri Sinjai. “Putusan No. 92/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Snj: Kasus Embang Bin Sudding.” Mahkamah Agung, 2022. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/search.html.
Pengadilan Negeri Tual. “Putusan No. 2/Pid.B/2019/: Kasus Ali Rahareng Alias Ali.” Mahkamah Agung, 2019. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/search.html.
Ramadhani, Milenia. “Tantangan Implementasi Pengakuan Hukum Adat Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Baru Di Indonesia.” Syntax Idea 6, no. 8 (August 19, 2024): 2708–3716. https://doi.org/10.46799/syntax-idea.v6i8.4356.
Risna Nurrohmah, Putri. “Peranan Hukum Pidana Adat Dalam Pembangunan Hukum Nasional Di Era Globalisasi Milenial.” De Juncto Delicti: Journal of Law 1, no. 1 (August 18, 2021): 61–75. https://doi.org/10.35706/djd.v1i1.5471.
Rodliyah, Siti, Andrik Purwasito, Bani Sudardi, and Wakit Abdullah. “Between Economic Burden and Cultural Dignity: Belis in the Marital Custom of the NTT Society.” Komunitas 9, no. 1 (March 2017): 92–103. https://doi.org/10.15294/komunitas.v9i1.8672.
Setiady, Tolib. Intisari Hukum Adat Indonesia. Jakarta: Alfabeta, 2018.
Setyaningsih, Ni Putu Ari, and Putu Chandra Kinandana Kayuan. “Kompilasi Delik Adat Dalam Peraturan Daerah Sebagai Dasar Pemidanaan Dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (RUU KUHP).” Jurnal Yustitia 16, no. 1 (May 2022): 71–79. https://doi.org/10.62279/yustitia.v16i1.902.
Soepomo. Bab-Bab Tentang Hukum Adat. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 1967.
Sudarto. Hukum Dan Hukum Pidana. Semarang: Yayasan Sudarto, 1977.
Suhariyanto, Budi. “Eksistensi Pembentukan Hukum Oleh Hakim Dalam Dinamika Politik Legislasi Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 4, no. 3 (December 31, 2015): 413. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v4i3.14.
Suteki, Taufani, and Galang. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum: Filsafat, Teori Dan Praktik. Depok: Rajawali Press, 2018.
Syarifuddin, La. “Sistem Hukum Adat Terhadap Upaya Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana.” Risalah Hukum 15, no. 2 (2019): 1–10.
Tene, Damianus Rama, Andi Muliyono, and Nurjanah Lahangatubun. “Implikasi Penerapan Hukum Pidana Adat Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Pasca Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Nasional Indonesia.” Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Dan Pendidikan 22, no. 2 (December 2023): 29–41. https://doi.org/10.30863/ekspose.v22i2.4151.
Watkat, Fransiscus X, and Eren Arif Budiman. “Hukum Pidana Adat ‘Antara Ada Dan Tiada.’” Jurnal Ius Publicum 2, no. 2 (April 28, 2022): 242–64. https://doi.org/10.55551/jip.v4i4.38.
Yoserwan, Yoserwan. “Eksistensi Hukum Pidana Adat Dalam Hukum Pidana Nasional Setelah Pengesahan Kuhp Baru.” UNES Law Review, 2023. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.577.
Published
2025-03-24
How to Cite
SULISTIO, Rian; NURJAYA, I Nyoman; MADJID, Abdul. The Living Law in Judicial Decisions: Formulation and Implications of the National Criminal Code. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, [S.l.], v. 25, n. 1, p. 70-90, mar. 2025. ISSN 2407-6562. Available at: <https://jos.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/jdh/article/view/15469>. Date accessed: 03 apr. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2025.25.1.15469.
Section
Articles