English

Every manuscript is reviewed by at least two reviewers under a double-blind process.

1. Initial screening (1–2 weeks). The editor checks scope, formatting against the journal template, and similarity (maximum 20%, see Plagiarism Policy). Manuscripts that fail are returned or declined.
2. Double-blind review (3–6 weeks). At least two independent reviewers with relevant expertise evaluate originality, methodological soundness, clarity, and contribution. Author and reviewer identities are concealed from each other.
3. Editorial decision. Based on reviewer reports, the editor decides: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject.
4. Revision (maximum 4 weeks). Authors revise and submit a point-by-point response to reviewers. Major revisions may be returned to the reviewers.
5. Final decision. The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision. Accepted manuscripts proceed to copyediting, layout, and online publication.

Bahasa Indonesia

Setiap naskah ditelaah oleh minimal dua reviewer secara double-blind.

1. Penyaringan awal (1–2 minggu). Editor memeriksa kesesuaian ruang lingkup, format sesuai templat, dan tingkat kemiripan (maksimum 20%, lihat Kebijakan Plagiarisme). Naskah yang tidak memenuhi syarat dikembalikan atau ditolak.
2. Telaah double-blind (3–6 minggu). Minimal dua reviewer independen menilai orisinalitas, ketepatan metode, kejelasan, dan kontribusi. Identitas penulis dan reviewer dirahasiakan satu sama lain.
3. Keputusan editor. Berdasarkan laporan reviewer, editor memutuskan: Diterima, Revisi Minor, Revisi Mayor, atau Ditolak.
4. Revisi (maksimum 4 minggu). Penulis merevisi naskah dan melampirkan tanggapan poin demi poin. Revisi mayor dapat dikirim kembali ke reviewer.
5. Keputusan akhir. Ketua Dewan Redaksi menetapkan keputusan akhir. Naskah yang diterima masuk ke tahap copyediting, tata letak, dan publikasi daring.