The Self-Defeating Liberal International Order: Organized Hypocrisy and Legitimacy Deficit

  • Mirah Satria Alamsyah Universitas Bangka Belitung
  • Miftah Farid Darussalam Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Abstract

This study argues that the Liberal International Order (LIO) is self-defeating, with its deterioration driven more by endogenous than exogenous factors. The principal endogenous factor identified is the LIO's organized hypocrisy, a condition in which the order's foundational norms, particularly self-determination and non-interference, are simultaneously upheld in discourse and systematically violated in practice by its own principal proponents. Drawing on the organized hypocrisy framework developed by Stephen C. Krasner, this study analyzes norm violations across four modalities: convention, contract, coercion, and imposition. It further argues that this organized hypocrisy contributes to a legitimacy deficit within the LIO, as evidenced by declining trust in the United Nations, an increasingly unfavorable global perception of the United States as the order's principal proponent, and the behavior of LIO beneficiaries who are actively seeking institutional alternatives such as BRICS. Employing a qualitative desk-based research method, this study concludes that the LIO is structurally self-defeating: its expansive liberal ambitions generate actions that undermine the sovereign norms upon which its own legitimacy rests.

Author Biography

Miftah Farid Darussalam, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Prodi Hubungan Internasional, 

Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Indonesia

Scopus ID:57218228558

Sinta ID:6724167

Published
2026-06-18
How to Cite
ALAMSYAH, Mirah Satria; DARUSSALAM, Miftah Farid. The Self-Defeating Liberal International Order: Organized Hypocrisy and Legitimacy Deficit. JUSS (Jurnal Sosial Soedirman), [S.l.], v. 9, n. 1, p. 149-173, june 2026. ISSN 2581-0316. Available at: <https://jos.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/juss/article/view/20452>. Date accessed: 20 june 2026. doi: https://doi.org/10.20884/juss.v9i1.20452.