Poverty and Data Accuracy as Public Administration Issues: A Study on Social Policy in Banyumas Regency
Abstract
This article explores the issue of poverty in Banyumas Regency within the framework of public administration, with a particular emphasis on the accuracy and consistency of poverty data as a foundation for formulating social policies. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach with purposive sampling techniques, the study uncovers discrepancies in poverty indicators and measurement approaches across local government units. These data inconsistencies significantly impact the accuracy of targeting social programs, thereby hindering the effectiveness of public policy implementation. Furthermore, the findings reveal that the problem is not merely technical but also indicative of weak data governance and poor inter-institution coordination. Therefore, the integration of data systems and harmonization of poverty indicators among institutions are crucial for supporting targeted, equitable, and data-driven policymaking.
References
Badrudin. (2012). Poverty measurement and the development of welfare indicators. Journal of Economics and Development of Indonesia, 13(2), 589–599.
Basu, K. (2001). On the goals of development. In G. Mavrotas & A. Shorrocks (Eds.), Advancing development: Core themes in global economics (pp. 3–16). Palgrave Macmillan.
Boltvinik, J. (1998). Poverty measurement methods: An overview. United Nations Development Programme.
Henry, N. (2017). Public administration and public affairs (13th ed.). Routledge.
Khan, S., Khan, I., & Azid, T. (2014). A critique on poverty line methodologies. World Applied Sciences Journal, 30(1), 70–73.
Leaver, B. L., Ehrman, M., & Shekhtman, B. (2005). Achieving success in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610431
Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of “muddling through”. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88.
Mac Cárthaigh, M. (2014). Understanding poverty: Concepts and data. Public Administration and Development, 34(5), 457–465.
Misturelli, F., & Heffernan, C. (2010). The shape of change: A memetic analysis of the definitions of poverty from the 1970s to the 2000s. Journal of International Development, 22(1), 51–71.
Saleh, M. (2013). Development administration: Concepts, theories, and issues. Refika Aditama.
Sen, A. (1976). Poverty: An ordinal approach to measurement. Econometrica, 44(2), 219–231.
Setiawan, B. (2000). Poverty and social protection. Pustaka Pelajar..
Shafritz, J. M., & Hyde, A. C. (Eds.). (2017). Classics of public administration (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Suwaldiman. (2004). The power of politic and lobbying parties in the Australian accounting regulation reform program. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 8(2), 66–78.
Internet Source
BKKBN. (2023). Publication of Key Performance Indicators (KPI) of BKKBN, 2023. https://www.bkkbn.go.id
Ministry of Social Affairs, Republic of Indonesia. (2023). Number Of Beneficiary Families And Food Social Assistance Budget By Province.
Statistics Indonesia (BPS). (2024, July 1). Poverty Profile in Indonesia, March 2024 (Official Statistical News No. 50/07/Th. XXVII). https://www.bps.go.id
Statistics Indonesia, Banyumas Regency Office. (2024, March). Poverty Profile of Banyumas Regency, March 2024. https://banyumaskab.bps.go.id
