Grey Zone Escalation: How China’s Hybrid Warfare is Reshaping Taiwan’s Security
Abstract
Abstract
Grey-zone conflict and hybrid warfare have become increasingly prominent forms of strategic competition in the Indo-Pacific region, particularly in cross-strait relations. Unlike conventional conflicts marked by open warfare, grey-zone strategies operate below the threshold of war through ambiguous, incremental, and multi-domain coercive actions. In the context of Taiwan, China's pressure extends beyond military demonstrations to include information operations, cyberattacks, economic coercion, and maritime activities aimed at undermining political stability and weakening overall security resilience. This evolving environment suggests that Taiwan's security challenges have become more complex. This study examines two key issues: (1) how China's grey-zone strategy and hybrid warfare shape Taiwan's national security policies, and (2) the dominant forms of China's hybrid warfare tactics within grey-zone operations and their implications for Taiwan's security stability. The author employs a qualitative, descriptive-analytical approach, focusing on Taiwan. Moreover, data were collected through document-based research and media tracking, official statements, credible international news sources, and relevant academic literature. The data were analysed using Miles and Huberman's qualitative data analysis framework, which comprises data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing and verification, to ensure a comprehensive analysis. The findings suggest that China's grey-zone escalation has driven significant adjustments in Taiwan's security policy, shifting from a primarily conventional defense orientation toward a broader framework of comprehensive security and national resilience. This shift is reflected in Taiwan's increasing emphasis on cybersecurity, counter-disinformation measures, and critical infrastructure protection. Moreover, information operations, cyber pressure, and military exercises emerge as the most dominant hybrid tactics employed by China. These tactics intensify the complexity of Taiwan's security environment, affecting both national defense priorities and socio-political resilience. In conclusion, China's grey-zone and hybrid warfare strategies function not only as coercive instruments but also as mechanisms that gradually reshape Taiwan's security agenda.
Keywords: Cross-Strait Relations, Grey Zone Strategy, Hybrid Warfare, Taiwan's Security, Cybersecurity
Abstrak
Fenomena konflik grey-zone dan hybrid warfare semakin menonjol sebagai bentuk kompetisi strategis di kawasan Indo-Pasifik, khususnya dalam hubungan lintas selat (cross-strait relations) antara Cina dan Taiwan. Berbeda dengan konflik konvensional yang ditandai dengan perang terbuka, strategi grey-zone beroperasi di bawah ambang perang melalui tindakan koersif yang bersifat ambigu, bertahap, dan multidomain. Dalam konteks Taiwan, tekanan China tidak hanya terbatas pada demonstrasi kekuatan militer, tetapi juga mencakup operasi informasi, serangan siber, koersi ekonomi, serta aktivitas maritim yang bertujuan melemahkan stabilitas politik dan ketahanan keamanan Taiwan. Kondisi ini menunjukkan bahwa tantangan keamanan Taiwan telah bergeser menuju “era normal baru” yang semakin kompleks. Penelitian ini menganalisis dua isu utama, yaitu: (1) bagaimana strategi grey-zone dan hybrid warfare China membentuk kebijakan keamanan nasional Taiwan, serta (2) bentuk-bentuk taktik hybrid warfare China dalam operasi grey-zone terhadap Taiwan dan implikasinya terhadap stabilitas keamanan Taiwan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif-analitis dengan berfokus pada Taiwan. Data dikumpulkan melalui studi dokumentasi dan media tracking, yang mencakup dokumen kebijakan, pernyataan resmi, sumber berita internasional, serta literatur akademik yang relevan. Data dianalisis menggunakan kerangka analisis kualitatif Miles dan Huberman yang meliputi reduksi data, penyajian data, serta penarikan dan verifikasi kesimpulan untuk menghasilkan analisis yang komprehensif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa eskalasi strategi grey-zone China mendorong penyesuaian signifikan dalam kebijakan keamanan Taiwan, dari orientasi pertahanan konvensional menuju kerangka keamanan komprehensif berbasis ketahanan nasional. Perubahan ini tercermin dalam meningkatnya perhatian Taiwan terhadap keamanan siber, kebijakan kontra-disinformasi, dan perlindungan infrastruktur kritis. Selain itu, operasi informasi, tekanan siber, dan latihan militer muncul sebagai taktik hibrida paling dominan yang digunakan China. Taktik tersebut memperbesar kompleksitas ancaman keamanan Taiwan, baik pada aspek pertahanan nasional maupun ketahanan sosial-politik. Dengan demikian, strategi grey-zone dan hybrid warfare China berfungsi tidak hanya sebagai instrumen tekanan, tetapi juga sebagai mekanisme yang secara gradual membentuk ulang agenda keamanan Taiwan.
References
https://doi.org/10.51174/ajdss.0101/capi9993
Bhatia, K. (2018). Coercive gradualism through gray zone statecraft in the South China Seas: China's strategy and potential U.S. options. Joint Force Quarterly, 91(4th Quarter), 24–33.
Bellocchi, L. P. (2023). The Strategic Importance of Taiwan to the United States and Its Allies: Part Two – Policy since the Start of the Russia-Ukraine War. The US Army War College Quarterly Parameters, 53(3). https://doi.org/10.55540/0031 1723.3241
Bízik, v., kosárová, d., potočňák, a., & stojar, r. (2022). Hybrid interference: from the particular to a continuum. Obrana a strategie (defence & strategy), 22(1), 75.
https://doi.org/10.3849/18027199.22.2022.01.075-088
Bukhari, S. R. H., Khan, A. U., Haq, I. U., & Ullah, T. (2024). The Geopolitical Implications of Taiwan-China Relations on Regional Security, Spry Contemporary Educational Practices 3(1),104. https://doi.org/10.62681/ sprypublishers.scep/3/1/6
Carment, D., & Belo, D. (2020). Gray-zone conflict management: Theory, evidence, and challenges. European, Middle Eastern, & African Affairs, Summer 2020, 21–41
Chang, C., & Yang, A. H. (2020). Weaponized Interdependence: China's Economic Statecraft and Social Penetration against Taiwan. Orbis, 64(2), 312. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.orbis.2020.02.002
Chen, W., Ou, C.-H., Min, Y., & Shih, Y.-C. (2024). China's gray zone actions in the East China Sea, Taiwan Strait, and South China Sea: A comparative study and impact on fisheries. Marine Policy, 167, 106246. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.marpol.2024.106246
Çifçi, o. (2024). China's hybrid warfare approach within the framework of unrestricted warfare theory and three warfares strategy. Dergipark (Istanbul University). https://dergipark.org.tr /tr/pub/sbed/issue/88723/1499034
Constantinescu, M. (2023). Measuring economic resilience for the CEE and Black Sea countries in the framework of comprehensive defense. Security and Defence Quarterly. https://doi.org/ 10.35467/sdq/175379
Dunlap, C. J., Jr. (2001, November 29). Law and military interventions: Preserving humanitarian values in 21st conflicts
Feryna, J., & Kutěj, L. (2023). Implications for China from the War in Ukraine: Comparison of the Western and Taiwanese Views. Obrana a Strategie (Defence & Strategy), 23(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.3849/1802-7199.23.2023.002.023-038
Hörster, T. (2024). Spiral of Insecurity: On Diverging Partisan Preferences on National Defense in Taiwan. Available at SSRN 5040105. https://doi.org/ 10.2139/ssrn.5040105
Hung, T.-C., & Hung, T.-W. (2022). How China's Cognitive Warfare Works: A Frontline Perspective of Taiwan's Anti-Disinformation Wars. Journal of Global Security Studies, 7(4). https://doi.org/ 10.1093/jogss/ogac016
Ji, Y. (2006). China's anti-secession law and the risk of war in the Taiwan Strait. Contemporary Security Policy, 27(2), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13523260600821376
Kaloudis, M. (2024). Digital Sovereignty as a Weapon of Diplomacy in Cyber Warfare in. National Security in the Digital and Information Age, 17. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1005231
Kirchberger, S. (2021). Eskalationsrisiken im Westpazifik – Inwieweit berühren diese die Interessen der NATO? SIRIUS - Zeitschrift Für Strategische Analysen, 5(4), 344. https://doi.org/10.1515/ sirius-2021-4004
Kuo, R. C., Curriden, C., Cooper, C. A., Chang, J., Smith, J., & Ke, I. (2023). Simulating Chinese Gray Zone Coercion of Taiwan: Identifying Redlines and Escalation Pathways. Zeitschrift Für Strategische Analysen, 7(4), 427. https://doi.org/10.1515/sirius-2023-4008
Liang, S., & Shao, H.-L. (2024). Escalating Tensions in East Asia: Conflict Risk Levels of Gray Zone in the Taiwan ADIZ Area. Available at SSRN 4970948. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4970948
Lin, B., Garafola, C. L., mcclintock, B., Blank, J., Hornung, J. W., Schwindt, K., Moroney, J. D. P., Orner, P., Borrman, D., Denton, S. W., & Chambers, J. P. (2022). A New Framework for Understanding and Countering China's Gray Zone Tactics. In RAND Corporation ebooks. https://doi.org/10.7249/rba594-1
Mumford, A., & Carlucci, P. (2023). Hybrid warfare: The continuation of ambiguity by other means. European Journal of International Security, 8(2), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2022.19
Monyae, D. (2018). US, Russia, China and Africa in the Evolving Global Order. Changing Societies & Personalities, 2(4), 351. https://doi.org/10.15826 /csp.2018.2.4.051
Press, U. (2023). Parameters Autumn 2023. The US Army War College Quarterly Parameters, 53(3). https://doi.org/10.55540/0031-1723.3237 Rai
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2016). National Security Space Defense and Protection. In National Academies Press https://doi.org/10.17226/23594
Rahman, S. (2025). Taiwan's International Cooperation Development in the Post-COVID Era: Perception and Challenges in the Global Arena. International Journal of Asia Pacific Studies, 21(2), 297. https://doi.org/10.21315/ijaps2025.21.2.15
Rai, M. S. (2022). Revisiting QUAD ambition in the Indo Pacific leveraging Space and Cyber Domain. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.04609.
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2209.04609
Sarjito, A. (2024). China's Gray Zone Strategy in the South China Sea: Tactics, Objectives, and Regional Implications. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences 3(2), 113. https://doi.org/10.59066/ijoms.v3i2.559
Shen, C. (2022). Why Can the Frail Status Quo in the Taiwan Strait be Preserved? Analyzing the Econ-political Synergy among China, Taiwan, and United States. Modern Economics & Management Forum, 3(6), 366. https://doi.org/10.32629/memf.v3i6.1103
Shih, Z. (2024). The Silent Invasion: The Strategy and Mechanism of China's Information Warfare on Taiwanese National Identity. Ph.D Dissertation of University of Michigan. https://doi.org/10.7302/22647
Song, Y.-H., & Zou, K. (2014). Major Law and Policy Issues in the South China Sea: European and American Perspectives (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315593210
Stošić, S. (2023). The nature of China and Taiwan conflicting relations. Politika Nacionalne Bezbednosti, 24(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.5937/pnb24-44065
Sukumar, A. M., Deo, A., Ohlin, D., & Hollis, D. B. (2021). The Specter of Chinese Interference: Examining Beijing’s Inroads into India’s Digital Spaces and Political Activity, in Jens David Ohlin, and Duncan B. Hollis (eds), Defending Democracies: Combating Foreign Election Interference in a Digital Age In Oxford University Press, 117. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197556979.003.0006
Sullivan, J. (2024). Time Matters in Cross-Strait Relations: Tsai Ing-wen and Taiwan's Future. The China Quarterly, 259, 629. https://doi.org/10.1017/ s0305741023001649
Todd, C., H., Krista, R. G., & Tyler, L. (2024). Understanding and Countering China's Maritime Gray Zone Operations. In RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/ 10.7249/rra2954-1
Tyler, L., C., H., Todd, & Krista, R. G. (2024). How the United States Can Support Allied and Partner Efforts to Counter China in the Gray Zone: Affirmative Engagement. In RAND Corporation https://doi.org/10.7249/ rra2954-2
Welch, M. (2017). Review of the book Lawfare: Law as a weapon of war, by O. F. Kittrie. Queen's Law Journal, 42(2), 147–155.
West, M., & Insisa, A. (2023). Reunifying Taiwan with China through Cross-Strait Lawfare. The China Quarterly, 257, 186. https://doi.org/10.1017 /s0305741023000735
Wither, J. K. (2023). Hybrid Warfare Revisited: A Battle of 'Buzzwords.' Connections The Quarterly Journal, 22(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.11610/ connections.22.1.02
Xin, Q. (2023). Anti-interference: Redoubled focus of Chinese mainland's Taiwan policy. China International Strategy Review, 5, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42533-023-00131-8
Yakti, P. D., Susanto, S. R., Wicaksana, I. G. W., & Afdholy, N. (2025). Tracing the strategic roots of Confucianism in China's contemporary foreign policy. Masyarakat Kebudayaan Dan Politik, 38(2), 202. https://doi.org/10.20473/ mkp.v38i22025.202-214
Yelery, A. (2025). The Taiwan-China Relations and the Intersecting Projectiles of Power and Integrations in the Asia Pacific. International Journal of Asia Pacific Studies, 21(2), 257. https://doi.org/10.21315/ijaps2025.21.2.13
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. The author retains copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons attribution license that allows others to share the work within an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication of this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their websites) before and during submission, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and more extraordinary citations of published works.
.png)
