The Impact of Patronage and Political Support on the Determination of Priority Issues and Vision- Mission

A Case Study of the 2024 Yogyakarta Mayoral Election

Abstract

Every five years, the routine of local executive elections is inevitably intertwined with patronage and political support. Who the candidate is and who backs them often wields more power than their track record and ideas. It's no secret that the political cost of such candidacies is substantial, not just in terms of finances but also in the endorsements that play a significant role in securing votes. Unfortunately, both endorsers and those behind the candidates typically expect reciprocal benefits, whether it be securing positions or projects. This can lead to a biased formulation of priority issues and visions from the outset. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the extent to which patronage and political support influence the determination of priority issues and visions in the 2024 Yogyakarta mayoral election. Using a qualitative approach, this research will describe the internal political dynamics of political parties and interest groups in determining the policy direction of mayoral candidates. Data will be collected through document analysis through the news and social media of each candidate pair or representatives of each candidate pair, then it will be analyze by the Miles and Huberman theory. It is hoped that this research will provide a deeper understanding of the political decision-making process at the local level and its implications for public participation.