Publication Ethics
For Publication
-
All submitted manuscripts are reviewed by at least two reviewers who are expert in their subject.
-
The originality, soundness, novelty and language are factors that are taken into account in review by reviewers.
-
The result of review is categorized into eligible to publish without revision, eligible to publish with minor revision, eligible to publish with major revision, and rejection.
-
There is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted even authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit the manuscript.
-
Rejected manuscript will not be re-reviewed.
For Editor
-
Editors have full responsibility and authority to reject/accept a manuscript.
-
Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers published.
-
Editors should provide all information required by authors to improve the publication.
-
Editors should preserve the identity or anonymity of reviewers.
-
Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest among authors, reviewers and board members.
For Authors
-
Authors have to certify that the manuscript has not previously been published or is not being considered for publication elsewhere.
-
Authors have to certify that manuscript submitted is free from plagiarism.
-
Authors have to follow the rule of guideline of JAME.
-
Authors state that all data analyzed are real.
For Reviewers
-
Reviewers should evaluate a manuscript solely on academic merits, in which if a conflict of interest is detected it should be immediately notified to the editor.
-
Reviewers have to keep all information related to the manuscript reviewed.
-
Reviewers should review a manuscript objectively.
-
Reviewers should notify clearly on unclear statement written by authors.
-
Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulted from competitive or relationships with any of the authors.
-
If plagiarism is detected, reviewers should notify the editors immediately.