The Effect of Participatory Budgeting on Budget Risk Avoidance, Budget Slack and Organizational Performance Accountability

  • Wakhid Ansori Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya
  • David Pangaribuan Master of Accounting Faculty of Economics and Business University of Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya
  • Tutty Nuryati Master of Accounting Faculty of Economics and Business University of Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role of participatory budgeting in influencing budgeting risk, budgetary slack, and organizational performance accountability. Budgeting is a fundamental management tool that functions as a mechanism for planning, coordination, supervision, performance evaluation, and motivation. However, the involvement of multiple parties in the budgeting process creates both opportunities and challenges. While participatory budgeting enhances transparency, information quality, commitment, and motivation, it may also trigger dysfunctional behaviors such as budgetary slack, information asymmetry, and conflicts of interest. Using a deductive qualitative approach based on literature review, this article examines the behavioral aspects of budgeting, agency theory perspectives, and the ethical implications of budgetary slack. The findings indicate that participatory budgeting can improve performance accountability by increasing ownership, strengthening organizational commitment, and reducing budget variance. Nevertheless, excessive or poorly managed participation may increase budgeting risks, including inaccurate cost estimates, operational risks, financial risks, and opportunistic behavior. Risk aversion and information asymmetry are identified as key factors contributing to the emergence of budgetary slack. The study concludes that participatory budgeting positively affects managerial performance and organizational accountability when supported by ethical standards, transparency, strict supervision, and effective coordination. Properly managed participation can reduce budgeting risk and minimize budgetary slack, thereby improving efficiency, strengthening governance, and enhancing organizational performance.

References

Agustami, S., & Arfan, D. (2015). The Effect of Budget Preparation Participation on Budgetary Slack with Organizational Commitment as a Moderating Variable. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.17509/jrak.v3i2.6613
Aliabadi, F. J., Mashayekhi, B., & Gal, G. (2019). Budget Preparers’ Perceptions and Performance-Based Budgeting Implementation: The Case of Iranian Public Universities and Research Institutes. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 31(1), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-04-2018-0037
Argyris, C. (2013). The impact of budgets on people. In The evolution of behavioral accounting research (RLE accounting) (pp. 1–39). Routledge.
Baiman, S. (1982). Agency Research in Managerial Accounting: A Survey. Journal of Accounting Literature, 154–213.
Barrainkua, I., & Espinosa-Pike, M. (2018). The influence of auditors’ commitment to independence enforcement and firms’ ethical culture on auditors’ professional values and behaviour.
Brigham, E. F., Houston, J. F., & Clark, D. A. (2004). Fundamentals of financial management.
Chong, V. K., & Khudzir, N. F. (2018). The Effect of Mutual Monitoring and Need for Achievement on Budgetary Slack in a Team-Based Environment. Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, 21, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1475-148820180000021001
Dunk, A. (1993). The Effect of Budget Emphasis and Information Asymmetry on the Relation Between Budgetary Participation and Slack. The Accounting Review, 68(2), 400–410.
Dunn, P., & Sainty, B. (2020). Professionalism in Accounting: A Five-Factor Model of Ethical Decision-Making. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(2), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11-2017-0240
Elhamma, A., & Taouab, O. (2015). Budgetary evaluation, environmental uncertainty and performance: case of Moroccan firms. American Journal of Service Science and Management, 2(1), 1–6.
Erina, N. P. D., & Suartana, W. (2016). Influence of Budgeting Participation, Budget Emphasis, Individual Capacity, and Targeted Budget Clarity on Budgetary Slack. E-Journal of Accounting at Udayana University, 15.
Ferawati, D., Yusrarlaini, Y., & Savitri, D. (2015). Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran Terhadap Senjangan Anggaran (Budgetary Slack) dengan Asimetri Informasi, Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Komitmen Organisasi Sebagai Variabel Moderating (Studi Empiris pada Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Rokan Hilir).
Gill, A., Mand, H. S., Biger, N., & Mathur, N. (2018). Influence of religious beliefs and spirituality on decision to insure. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 13(5), 780–800. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-07-2017-0235
Kenis, I. (1979). Effects of budgetary goal characteristics on managerial attitudes and performance. The Accounting Review, 54(4), 707–721.
Kusniawati, H., & Lahaya, I. A. (2017). Pengaruh partisipasi anggaran, penekanan anggaran, asimetri informasi terhadap kelonggaran anggaran di SKPD Kota Samarinda. ACCOUNTABLE: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan, 14(2), 144–156.
Leach-López, M. A., Stammerjohan, W. W., Lee, E., & Stammerjohan, C. A. (2015). Relationship of budget participation conflict and job performance of South Korean managers. Cross Cultural Management, 22(4), 608–629. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCM-02-2014-0026
Mahoney, T. A. (1963). Development of managerial performance: A research approach. South-western Publishing Company.
Mardiasmo. (2004). Public Sector Accounting. Andi Offset.
Matiin, N. (2024). Penganggaran perusahaan. Penerbit Tahta Media.
Milani, K. (1975). The relationship of participation in budget-setting to industrial supervisor performance and attitudes: a field study. The Accounting Review, 50(2), 274–284.
Mirza, B., & Adi, M. (2020). TRUTH VS. SLACK INDUCING PARADOX: HOW DOES COMPENSATION SCHEME MITIGATE SOCIAL PRESSURE ON BUDGETARY SLACK? THE INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 23(2).
Nor Yahya, M., Nazli Nik Ahmad, N., & Hamid Fatima, A. (2008). Budgetary participation and performance: some Malaysian evidence. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(6), 658–673.
Nurcahyani, K., & Syafruddin, M. (2010). Pengaruh partisipasi anggaran terhadap kinerja manajerial melalui komitmen organisasi dan persepsi inovasi sebagai variabel intervening.
Putri, N. P. D. P. K., & Dwija, I. G. A. M. A. (2025). ENVIRONMENTAL UNCERTAINTY AS A MODERATOR OF THE INFLUENCE OF PARTICIPATIVE BUDGETING AND BUDGETARY EMPHASIS ON BUDGETARY SLACK IN THREE-STAR HOTELS IN BADUNG REGENCY. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2(1), 257–271.
Risandini, T., Prayogo, Y., & Ifazah, L. (2024). Pegaruh Kejelasan Sasaran Anggaran dan Sistem Pelaporan Terhadap Akuntabilitas Kinerja. Journal of Islamic Accounting Competency, 4(1), 79–95.
Shim, J. K., & Siegel, J. G. (2001). Budgeting Basics and Beyond (2nd Edition). John Wiley & Sons.
Strauß, E., & Zecher, C. (2013). Management control systems: a review. Journal of Management Control, 23(4), 233–268.
Supriyono, R. A. (2001). Akuntansi Manajemen 3: Proses Pengendalian Manajemen. BPFE.
Wulandari, N. E., & Mutmainah, S. (2011). Pengaruh partisipasi penyusunan anggaran Terhadap kinerja aparat pemerintah Daerah: Kepuasan Kerja dan Komitmen Organisasi sebagai variabel moderating (Studi empiris pada Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Demak).
Young, S. M. (1985). Participative Budgeting: The Effects of Risk Aversion and Asymmetric Information on Budgetary Slack. Journal of Accounting Research, 23(2), 829–842.
Published
2026-04-22
How to Cite
ANSORI, Wakhid; PANGARIBUAN, David; NURYATI, Tutty. The Effect of Participatory Budgeting on Budget Risk Avoidance, Budget Slack and Organizational Performance Accountability. SAR (Soedirman Accounting Review) : Journal of Accounting and Business, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 1, p. 01 - 18, apr. 2026. ISSN 2598-0718. Available at: <https://jos.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/sar/article/view/18830>. Date accessed: 30 apr. 2026. doi: https://doi.org/10.32424/1.sar.2026.11.1.18830.
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.