Interaksi Sarjana Muslim dan Sarjana Barat dalam Diskursus Hadis
Abstract
Hadith is everything that is based on the Prophet Muhammad Salallahu Alaihi Wassalam, both in the form of words, attitudes, and other cases in which there is approval of the Prophet Muhammad Salallahu Alaihi Wassalam. His position became the second source of law after the Qur'an because it contained news that could be used as a guide by Muslims. The development of hadith is not like the Qur'an which is easy and smooth. This is due to the large number of Western scholars who began to weaken Islam by studying the hadith to find evidence of the authenticity of the hadith. So that the hadith experts try to put up a fight by exposing the error of the study of Western scholars related to the hadith discourse. This article aims to describe the various discourses on hadith, both from among Muslims and non-Islamic circles or Orientalists. The aim is none other than trying to find views on the traditions of Muslim scholars and among Western scholars who study the hadith. In addition, as for the specific purpose is to find the interaction that occurs from the Muslim community over their views on the Orientalist
References
Amin, Kamaruddin, Menguji Kembali Keakuratan Metode Kritik Hadis, (Jakarta Selatan: PT Hikmah, 2009).
Anshori, Muhammad, ‘Kajian Ketersambungan Sanad’. Jurnal Living Hadis. 1. 2 (2016), pp. 294-324.
Arifin, Tajul, The Application of “ Unity Theory” In understanding Matan of Al-Qur’an Hadis And Determining Its Validity, Critique to The Critique of Orientalis (Bandung: Inaugural Speech, 2009).
Ash-Shiddieqy, M. Hasbi, Sejarah dan pengantar Ilmu Hadis (Semarang: Pustaka Rizki
Putra, 1999).
Assamurai, Qasim, Bukti-bukti Kebohongan Orientalis (Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 1983).
As-Syiba’i, Mustafa Hassan, Membongkar Kepalsuan Orientalisme (Yogyakarta: Mitra Pustaka, 1997).
Brown, Daniel, Rethinking Tradition in Modern Islamic Thought (Bandung: Mizan, 2000).
Buchori, Mannan, Menyingkap Tabir Orientalisme (Jakarta: Amzah, 2006).
Darmalaksana, Wahyudin, Hadis Dimata Orientalis (Bandung: Benang Merah Press, 2004).
Hallaq, Wael B., The Authenticity of Prophetic Hadis: A Pseudo-problem Courtesy: Studia Islamica (Canada: Mc Gill University, 1999).
Hanafi, A., Orientalisme Ditinjau Menurut Kacamata Agama: Qur’an dan Hadis (Jakarta: Pustaka al Husna, 1981).
Huda, Nailil dan Ade Pahrudin, ‘Orientasi Kajian Hadis Kontemporer Indonesia: Studi Artikel E-Jurnal dalam Portal Moraref 2015-2017’, Jurnal Refleksi 17.2 (2018), pp. 169-191.
Idri, ‘Perspektif Orientalis tentang Hadis Nabi; Telaah Kritis dan Implikasinya terhadap Eksistensi Kehujjahannya’. Al-Tahrir, 11.1 (2011), pp. 199-216.
Isnaeni, Ahmad, ‘Pemikiran Goldziher dan Azami tentang Penulisan Hadis’. Kalam: Jurnal Studi Agama dan Pemikiran Islam, 6.2 (2012), pp. 363-390.
Jamilah, Maryam, Islam dan Orientalisme, Sebuah Kajian Analitik (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1997).
Joynboll, G.H.A, The Authenticity of Tradition Literature Discursions in Modern Egypt (Bandung: Mizan, 1999).
Mahmudah, Nur, ‘Pemikiran G. H. A. Juynboll tentang Hadis’, Mutawatir: Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir dan Hadis, 3.1 (2013), pp. 106-122.
Maidin, Muhammad Sabir, Ingkar Sunah Atau Hadis Dalam Perspktif Historis, (Makassar: Alauddin Press. 2012).
Masrur, Ali, Teori Common Link G.H.A. Juynboll: Melacak Akar Kesejarahan Hadis Nabi, Cet. I. (Yogyakarta: Lkis, 2007).
Muir, William, The Life of Muhammad and the History of Islam to the Era of Hengira, Jilid I. (London: Oxford, 1988).
Setyawan, Cahya Edi, ‘Studi Hadis; Analisis terhadap Pemikiran Schacht dan Azami’, Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner, 1.2 (2016), pp. 253-280.
Suadi, Hasan, ‘Menyoal Kritik Sanad Josepht Schacht’, Riwayah: Jurnal Studi Hadis, 2.1 (2016), pp. 89-104.
Wahid, Abdurrahman, M.M. Azami Pembela Eksistensi Hadis (Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 2002).
Wijaya, Aksin, Arah Baru Studi Ulumul Qur’an (Yogyakarta; Pustaka Pelajar, 2009).
Yakub, Ali Mustafa, Kritik Hadis (Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 1996).
Zuhri, Muh, ‘Perkembangan Kajian Hadits Kesarjanaan Barat’, Jurnal Ulul Albab, 16.2 (2015).
