The Peer Review Process is an integral part of ensuring the quality and validity of the articles published in Linggamas: Jurnal Pengabdian masyarakat. Our journal follows a double-blind peer review process, which means that the identities of both the authors and reviewers are kept confidential.

1. Submission: After a manuscript is submitted, it undergoes an initial review by the editorial team to ensure it meets the journal's scope and basic requirements.

2. Reviewer Selection: The editorial team selects expert reviewers who have relevant expertise in the subject matter of the manuscript. Reviewers are chosen for their impartiality and objectivity.

3. Peer Review: Reviewers evaluate the manuscript for its originality, methodology, relevance to the journal's focus and scope, clarity of presentation, and contribution to the field. They provide constructive feedback and make recommendations for revisions if necessary.

4. Author Response: Authors receive the reviewers' comments and are given the opportunity to revise and improve their manuscript based on the feedback received. They should provide a point-by-point response to each comment.

5. Final Decision: The editorial team, taking into consideration the reviewers' comments and the revised manuscript, makes a final decision on whether to accept the manuscript, request further revisions, or reject it.

6. Confidentiality: Throughout the process, the identities of both the authors and the reviewers are kept confidential to ensure an unbiased evaluation.

7. Ethical Considerations: Linggamas: Jurnal Pengabdian masyarakat adheres to ethical guidelines for the peer review process and handles any conflicts of interest or ethical concerns transparently.