Collaboration With |
The Indonesian Public Health Association/ IPHA
The journal employs a peer-review mechanism where each submitted article should be anonymously reviewed by expert peers appointed by the editor. Articles published in this journal could be in form of the original article and editorials and literature review).
Published articles on Insights in Public Health Journal (IPHJ) will go through a review process by a selected reviewer. Decisions regarding the acceptance of an article are right on the Editor Team based on advice and comments from the reviewer was decided in a meeting of the editorial team. Articles received will be examined for the existence of elements of plagiarism by using the Turnitin program.
The process can be described as follow.
1. The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor. It will be evaluated whether it is suitable for the IPHJ focus and scope or has a major methodological flaw and similarity score by using Turnitin. The decision is rejected or accepted for a review process.
2. The manuscript will be sent to at least two reviewers with Double Blind Review. Reviewers' comments are then sent to the corresponding author for necessary actions and responses.
3. Afterward, the editorial team meeting suggested the final decision on the revised manuscript by the authors.
4. Finally, the Editor will send the final decision to the corresponding author.
5. The accepted manuscript then continued to the copyediting and layout editing process to prepare the camera-ready paper.
Review Outcomes
Utilizing feedback from the peer review process, the Editor will make a final publication decision. Decisions categories include: