Login or Register to make a submission.

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.

  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  • The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format.
  • Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
  • The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.


Types of Publications

Journal of Dental and Biosciences (JDB) has no limit on the length of the manuscript, provided the test is short and comprehensive. The manuscript must be written completely experimentally and detailed so that the results can be reproduced. JDB requires all authors published all experimental control and make complete data sets if possible.

Manuscript submitted to JDB must not be published in any journals and media other than JDB Journal. Articles can be accepted by Journal articles:

  • Original research manuscripts: this journal received research original articles that experimental results report scientifically written systematically and contain new information. The quality and impact of the study results will be considered during the peer-review period.

  • Systematic Reviews: manuscripts written by reviewing the questions formulated with an explicit and systematic method to identify, select and critically assess relevant research, and to collect and analyze data from studies included in the review. Furthermore, a systematic review provided a quick update and accurate information about the latest advances in certain fields' research.

  • Case reports: the articles report in detail about symptoms, signs, diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients. Case reports describe unusual or new events and therefore remain one of the cornerstones of medical progress and provide many new ideas in medicine.


Submission process

All manuscripts must be submitted by the OJS online web system of JDB. The Author submitting the articles is the corresponding or the first author who can be responsible for the manuscripts during the peer-review process.



Accepted File Formats

The authors are invited to submit electronically 10-12 pages full paper through journal website. The submitted paper should follow the format available on the author guideline. The authors must use the Microsoft word template JDB.


Cover Letter

A cover letter could be included in each manuscript submission process. It should be written in detail and significance, findings in the context of the existing study and why it is within the scope of the journal. All authors proposed in the manuscript must be approved within the signed agreement.


Manuscript Preparation

Front Matter

These sections should appear in all manuscript types

  • Title: The title of your manuscript should be concise, specific and relevant. It should identify if the study reports (human or animal) trial data, or is a systematic review, meta-analysis or replication study. When gene or protein names are included, the abbreviated name rather than full name should be used.

  • Author List and Affiliations: Authors' full first and last names must be provided. The initials of any middle names can be added. The PubMed/MEDLINE standard format is used for affiliations: complete address information including city, zip code, state/province, and country. At least one author should be designated as the corresponding author, and his or her email address and other details should be included at the end of the affiliation section.

  • Abstract: The abstract should be a total of about 200 words maximum. The abstract should be a single paragraph and should follow the style of structured abstracts but without headings: 1) Background: Place the question addressed in a broad context and highlight the purpose of the study; 2) Methods: Describe briefly the main methods or treatments applied. Include any relevant preregistration numbers, and species and strains of any animals used. 3) Results: Summarize the article's main findings; and 4) Conclusion: Indicate the main conclusions or interpretations. The abstract should be an objective representation of the article: it must not contain results which are not presented and substantiated in the main text and should not exaggerate the main conclusions.

  • Keywords: Three to ten pertinent keywords need to be added after the abstract. We recommend that the keywords are specific to the article, yet reasonably common within the subject discipline.

Research Manuscript Sections

  • Introduction: The introduction should briefly place the study in a broad context and highlight why it is important. It should define the purpose of the work and its significance, including specific hypotheses being tested. The current state of the research field should be reviewed carefully and key publications cited. Please highlight controversial and diverging hypotheses when necessary. Finally, briefly mention the main aim of the work and highlight the main conclusions. Keep the introduction comprehensible to scientists working outside the topic of the paper.

  • Results: Provide a concise and precise description of the experimental results, their interpretation as well as the experimental conclusions that can be drawn.

  • Discussion: Authors should discuss the results and how they can be interpreted in perspective of previous studies and the working hypotheses. The findings and their implications should be discussed in the broadest context possible and limitations of the work highlighted. Future research directions may also be mentioned. This section may be combined with Results.

  • Materials and Methods: They should be described with sufficient detail to allow others to replicate and build on published results. New methods and protocols should be described in detail while well-established methods can be briefly described and appropriately cited. Give the name and version of any software used and make clear whether computer code used is available. Include any pre-registration codes.

  • Conclusions: This section is not mandatory, but can be added to the manuscript if the discussion is unusually long or complex.

Back Matter

  • Supplementary Materials: Describe any supplementary material published online alongside the manuscript (figure, tables, video, spreadsheets, etc.). Please indicate the name and title of each element as follows Figure S1: title, Table S1: title, etc.

  • Acknowledgements: All sources of funding of the study should be disclosed. Indicate grants that you have received in support of your research work and if you received funds to cover publication costs. Note that some funders will not refund article processing charges (APC) if the funder and grant number are not clearly and correctly identified in the paper. 

  • Author Contributions: Each author is expected to have made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data; or the creation of new software used in the work; or have drafted the work or substantively revised it;  For research articles with several authors, a short paragraph specifying their contributions must be provided. The following statements should be used "Conceptualization, X.X. and Y.Y.; Methodology, X.X.; Software, X.X.; Validation, X.X., Y.Y. and Z.Z.; Formal Analysis, X.X.; Investigation, X.X.; Resources, X.X.; Data Curation, X.X.; Writing – Original Draft Preparation, X.X.; Writing – Review & Editing, X.X.; Visualization, X.X.; Supervision, X.X.; Project Administration, X.X.; Funding Acquisition, Y.Y.”,

  • Conflicts of Interest: Authors must identify and declare any personal circumstances or interest that may be perceived as inappropriately influencing the representation or interpretation of reported research results. If there is no conflict of interest, please state "The authors declare no conflict of interest." Any role of the funding sponsors in the choice of the research project; design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results must be declared in this section.

  • References: References must be numbered in order of appearance in the text (including table captions and figure legends) and listed individually at the end of the manuscript. We recommend preparing the references with a bibliography software package, such as EndNoteReferenceManager or Mendeley to avoid typing mistakes and duplicated references.

In the text, reference numbers should be placed in square brackets [ ], and placed before the punctuation; for example [1], [1–3] or [1,3 The reference list should include the full title, as recommended by the ACS style guide. References should be described as follows, depending on the type of work:

  Journal Articles:

  1. Author 1, A.B.; Author 2, C.D. Title of the article. Abbreviated Journal NameYearVolume, page range.

  Books and Book Chapters:

  1. Author 1, A.; Author 2, B. Book Title, 3rd ed.; Publisher: Publisher Location, Country, Year; pp. 154–196.
    Author 1, A.; Author 2, B. Title of the chapter. In Book Title, 2nd ed.; Editor 1, A., Editor 2, B., Eds.; Publisher: Publisher Location, Country, Year; Volume 3, pp. 154–196.

  Unpublished work, submitted work, personal communication:

  1. Author 1, A.B.; Author 2, C. Title of Unpublished Work. status (unpublished; manuscript in preparation).

  2. Author 1, A.B.; Author 2, C. Title of Unpublished Work. Abbreviated Journal Name stage of publication (under review; accepted; in press).

  3. Author 1, A.B. (University, City, State, Country); Author 2, C. (Institute, City, State, Country). Personal communication, Year.

  Conference Proceedings:

  1. Author 1, A.B.; Author 2, C.D.; Author 3, E.F. Title of Presentation. In Title of the Collected Work(if available), Proceedings of the Name of the Conference, Location of Conference, Country, Date of Conference; Editor 1, Editor 2, Eds. (if available); Publisher: City, Country, Year (if available); Abstract Number (optional), Pagination (optional).

  Thesis:

  1. Author 1, A.B. Title of Thesis. Level of Thesis, Degree-Granting University, Location of University, Date of Completion.

  Websites:

  1. Title of Site. Available online: URL (accessed on Day Month Year). Unlike published works, websites may change over time or disappear, so we encourage you to create an archive of the cited website using a service such as WebCite. Archived websites should be cited using the link provided as follows:

  2. Title of Site. URL (archived on Day Month Year).
    See the Reference List and Citations Guidefor more detailed information.

Preparing Figures, Schemes and Tables

  • File for Figures and Schemes must be provided during submission in a single zip archive and at a sufficiently high resolution (minimum 1000 pixels width/height, or a resolution of 300 dpi or higher). Common formats are accepted, however, TIFF, JPEG, EPS and PDF are preferred.

  • Processes can publish multimedia files in articles or as supplementary materials. Please contact the editorial office for further information.

  • All Figures, Schemes and Tables should be inserted into the main text close to their first citation and must be numbered following their number of appearance (Figure 1, Scheme I, Figure 2, Scheme II, Table 1, etc.).

  • All Figures, Schemes and Tables should have a short explanatory title and caption.

  • All table columns should have an explanatory heading. To facilitate the copy-editing of larger tables, smaller fonts may be used, but no less than 8 pt. in size. Authors should use the Table option of Microsoft Word to create tables.

  • Authors are encouraged to prepare figures and schemes in color (RGB at 8-bit per channel). There is no additional cost for publishing full-color graphics.

Supplementary Materials, Data Deposit and Software Source Code

Data Availability

To maintain the integrity, transparency and reproducibility of research records, authors must make their experimental and research data openly available either by depositing into data repositories or by publishing the data and files as supplementary information in this journal.

Computer Code and Software

For work where novel computer code was developed, authors should release the code either by depositing in a recognized, public repository or uploading as supplementary information to the publication. The name and version of all software used should be indicated.

Supplementary Material

Additional data and files can be uploaded as "Supplementary Files" during the manuscript submission process. The supplementary files will also be available to the referees as part of the peer-review process. Any file format is acceptable, however, we recommend that common, non-proprietary formats are used where possible.

Unpublished Data

Restrictions on data availability should be noted during submission and in the manuscript. "Data not shown" should be avoided: authors are encouraged to publish all observations related to the submitted manuscript as Supplementary Material. "Unpublished data" intended for publication in a manuscript that is either planned, "in preparation" or "submitted" but not yet accepted, should be cited in the text and a reference should be added in the References section. "Personal Communication" should also be cited in the text and reference added in the References section.

References in Supplementary Files

Citations and References in Supplementary files are permitted provided that they also appear in the reference list of the main text.


Publications Ethics

For the original articles: manuscript of the resulting study using an animal model, the author must confirm that experiments carried out accordance with relevant guideline and regulations. The manuscript must be accompanied by a statement that all efforts have been made to minimize animal suffering, to minimize the number of animals used, and to utilize alternative in vivo techniques if available. A study involving animal must comply with the International Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research developed by The Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS).

Manuscript without proper consideration of ethics will not be accepted for publication. JDB follows the guidelines of the Publications Ethics Committee (COPE) regarding all aspects of publications ethics. The author experimenting on human subjects must state the activities carried out following the Declaration of Helsinki. All procedures are carried out with adequate understanding and written consent of the subject.


Review process

The review process is initiated through an increase in stages to the editor; each incoming paper will be screened by the members of the editorial board to check the paper's suitability with the journal. If the submitted paper has a suitability for publication, the corresponding author will receive a peer-review process notification. All manuscript reviewed by an editor and a member of the editorial board or have qualifications beyond the reviewer. The process will be done in a short time. The Journals will try its best to return the paper that has been commented by the reviewer no later than 3 weeks. Editorial boards will review the manuscript that has been received until the revision. Journal will give notification as a manuscript that will be published after the review process is complete. If the manuscript has been received before the journal publishing schedule, the journal will be published in a press until publication.

If the manuscript has received a revision process, then an article will be evaluated through several levels of evaluation:

  1. Accepted

  2. Accepted with major revision

  3. Accepted with minor revision

  4. Rejected or declined