Analisis Pendekatan Trust Politic Korea Selatan dalam Penyelesaian Hambatan Reunifikasi di Semenanjung Korea

  • Elpeni Fitrah Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
  • Zakie Andiko Ramadhani Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Abstract

This research investigates on South Korea trust politic approach under Park Geun Hye administration to handle the challenges of Korean reunification in Korean Peninsula based constructivism perspective. There are third challenges that faced by South Korea within Korean reunification which is international community believed on these challenges. Those challenges are the differences of ideology and system between South and North Korea, South Korea and United States of America military provocation, and North Korea’s nuclear weapon program. The type of this research is qualitative research that used secondary data by desk research approach and also using explanation methods to analyse the topic. Based on the result of this research, by using constructivism perspective those problems are not relevan more as barrier for Korean reunification in Korean peninsula. Today, the main problem to Korean reunification is what researcher called with “trust deficit” and identity changed. So that’s why South Korea used this kind approach where a structure of mistrust and confrontation is replaced by that of trust and cooperation. This structure changing is hoped to increase the possibility of reunification in Korean Peninsula between South and North Korea in the future.

References

Buku dan Jurnal
Cheon, S. (2013). Trust - The Underlying Philosophy of The Park Geun Hye Administration. Washington DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Coulter, J. (1982). Remarks on the Conceptualization of Social Structure. Philosophy of the Social Sciences(12), 42-43.
Hui, M. T. (2010). Reunification of Koreas A Major Security Issue on The Korean Peninsula: The North Korean Perspective. Singapura: Institute for Security and Development Policy.
Jackson, R., & Sorensen, G. (2005). Pengantar Studi Hubungan Internasional. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Jin, K. S. (1976). Korean Unification: Source Materials with an Introduction. Seoul: Research Center for Peace and Unification.
Jina, K. (2015). Source and Objectives of North Korea Foregn Policy : Identity, Values, and Negotiating
Behaviour. (C.-C. C. Utpal Vyas, Penyunt.) North Korea Crisis and Regional Responses, 3-19.
Kim, C. H., & Lee, W. (2016). North Korea’s responses to the trust-building on the Korean peninsula and future tasks. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 1-16.
Lee, S. H. (2010). A New Paradigm for Trust Building on the Korean Peninsula: Turning Korea's DMZ into a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Asia Public Journal - Japan Focus, 8(35).
Manyin, M. E. (2005). Foreign Assistance for North Korea. CRS Report for Congress.
Ouellette, Dean J. (2013, December). Building Trust in Inter-Korean Relations: A Role for Renewable Energy?, 11(2), 327-353.
Rosyidin, M. (2015). The Power of Ideas : Konstruktvisme dalam Studi Hubungan Internasional. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
Sagan, S. D. (1996-1997). Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapon?: Three Model in Search of a Bomb. International Security, 21(3), 54-86.
Se, H. Y. (2014). Security on the Korean Peninsula. Minister of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Korea. London: Chatam House The Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Sorensen, R. J. (2014). Pengantar Studi Hubungan Internasional Teori dan Pendekatan, Edisi Kelima. Dalam R. J. Sorensen, Introduction to International Relations, Fifth Edition. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Stryker, S. (1987). The Vitalization of Symbolic Interactionism. Social Psycology Quarterly (50), 93.
Sugiyono. (2008). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
Suh, M. B. (2013). A Tale of Two Koreas : Breaking the Vicious Circle.
Tatar, J. S. (2013). The New South Korean President's Foreign Policy Directions. Polski Instytut Spraw Miedzynarodowych, The Polish Institute of International Affairs . Warsawa, Poland: Polski Instytut Spraw Miedzynarodowych (PISM).
Waltz, K. (1990, September). Nuclear Myth and Political Realities. American Political Review, 84(3), 731-745.
Weber, L. R., & Carter, A. I. (2003). The Social Construction of Trust, The Analysis of Social Problems (1 ed.). New York: Springer US.
Wendt, A. (1992). Social Anarchy What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politic. International Organization, 46, 391-425.
Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Artikel Daring
Ministry of Unification (MoU). (2013, September 23). Trust Building Process on the Korean Peninsula. Diakses dari .
Putri Ainur Islam, O. Z. (2017, September 22). Okezone News. Diakses dari http://news.okezone.com/read/2017/09/22/18/1780711/mulai-meski-bersitegang-korsel-tetap-beri-bantuan-kemanusiaan-kepada-warga-korut.
Sindonews.com. (2018, Januari 26). Korsel - AS Kembali Gelar Latihan Militer Gabungan Pasca Olimpiade. Diakses dari https://international.sindonews.com/read/1276952/40/korsel-as-kembali-gelar-latihan-militer-gabungan-pasca-olimpiade=1516957560.
Published
2019-02-26
How to Cite
FITRAH, Elpeni; RAMADHANI, Zakie Andiko. Analisis Pendekatan Trust Politic Korea Selatan dalam Penyelesaian Hambatan Reunifikasi di Semenanjung Korea. Insignia: Journal of International Relations, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 2, p. 85-95, feb. 2019. ISSN 2597-9868. Available at: <http://jos.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/insignia/article/view/1222>. Date accessed: 02 may 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.ins.2018.5.2.1222.
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.