EXTENDED TAM TEST ON INDONESIAN SMEs’ FINTECH USERS & ITS FINANCIAL REPORTS

Indonesia have SME accounting standard that effective in 2018, but this standard adoption is not popular at that time. Hence recent fastest growing in financial technology adoption by food industries’ SME creating the need for having financial reports in order to make an exact reconciliation for the payment. This research wants to know whether this financial technology usage will lead to SME’s to make financial reports according to accounting standard. The model is designed to test the Extended Technology Acceptance Model (ExtendedTAM). Population here is SME in food industry that on Grabfood list. 100 sample were drawn using purposive sampling for SME that uses OVO, a financial technology company that partnering with Grabfood. Data then analyzes using WarpPLS.This results is consistent with Extended TAM. The result also shows that adoption of FinTech will trigger SME to make better financial reports to make reconciliation process in billing easier. Keyword: FinTech, Extended TAM, SMEs, Financial Reports


INTRODUCTION
Financial technology has been booming in Indonesia. One of the factors to induce this is the popular use of ride sharing services in Indonesia. There are two dominating ride sharing services namely Go-Jek and Grab that bringing efficient transport process with predictable and competitive prices (Yuana et al., 2018). They then developed into many ways of services from motorcycle and car sharing only, into other services such as food delivery. Along with that condition, later on these two companies using their own financial technology (FinTech) payment. FinTech is describes as technology adopted by financial services institution deliveries (Gai et al., 2017). Go-jek developed Go-pay, while grab having contract with OVO as in Nelloh et al. (2019).
While previous study focused on Go-Jek as the largest application and domestically ride sharing services (Silalahi et al., 2017), this research prefer to analyze Grab. The special thing with grab, is the head business that based on Singapore do not have services as complete as in Indonesia. It seems like they developed the special service in Indonesia due to response of its head-to-head positions in market with Go-jek (Susilo et al., 2019).
Many research tend to discuss about Go-Jek and Grab in the ride sharing services (Yuana et al., 2018;Silalahi et al., 2017;Santoso & Nelloh, 2017;Nasution et al., 2020;Suhartanto et al., 2020). This research will focus on OVO as Grab's FinTech. This is because Grab, rather than developed their own, they choose partnership with local FinTech called as OVO. These researches choose to study OVO due to this unique relationship.
This research will use SMEs that using Grabfood and OVO as their technology partner. Several research already research about the benefit use of Technology on Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) economic conditions. SMEs characterized as Mostly this sector struggle if have to use their own delivery services. They also do not have representative place for their business, do not have media to promote their product, and also usually still using cash and difficult to access additional financial funding. Ramadhanti et al. (2019) study shows that many SMEs is using marketing technology services in food delivery such as in Go-Food, a Grabfood rival. Furthermore the use of mobile payment service platform such as OVO can be useful for SMEs to access additional financing such as in Ibidunni et al. (2018).
One underlying theory in Accounting Information Technology Research is Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) by Davis (1986). This theory then developed into Extended TAM by Venkatesh and Davis (2000) by adding other variables. Further, as Accounting Information Technology Research, this study also examine whether the use of Financial Technology will lead SMEs to enhance their accountability by improve their financial reports quality.

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND HYPOTHESIS DEVELOPMENT
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) is an adaptation from Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA). TRA is designed to help explain and predict human social behavior in many different domains (Fishbein and Ajzen, 2011). TAM is making modification in TRA for explain human computer (Information Technology) usage behavior (Davis et al., 1989). The initial models of TAM consist of External Variables, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, Attitude toward Using, Behavioral Intention to Use, and Actual System Use. Moore and Benbasat (1991) later added five innovations attributes that consistently giving influence on technology adoption such as: Relative Advantage, Compatibility, Complexity, Observability, and Triability. Compatibility is defined as perception of user of level difficulty about a new technology Moore and Benbasat (1991). Agarwal and Prasad (1998) proposed Personal Innovativeness in the TAM model.
As an important construct to study individual behavior toward technology innovation adoption using their own personality traits. These additional variables then called as TAM2 or Extended TAM (Venkatesh and Davis, 2000) Hypothesis in this study is developed according to Extended Technology Acceptances Model framework. There are eleven hypotheses in this research as follows.
Compatibility is a variable in Extended TAM suggested by Moore and Benbasat (1991). Cheng (2014) stated that Compatibility have effect on Intention to Use, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Enjoyment. Septiani et al. (2017) (Davis et al., 1989). Venkatesh (2000) proposed additional Perceived Enjoyment that related to Perceived Ease of Use as well as Intention to Use. Davis et al. (1992) Cheng et al. (2014), Patel and Patel (2017), also Alalwan et al. (2018). Based on these Theory and Small and Medium Enterprises often lack in having a good financial reports (Perera and Chand, 2015). It needs to be induced by external factors such as legitimation and social pressure to ease the implementation of a good accounting information system (Riahi and Khoufi, 2019). Technological adoption in marketing can be example of social pressure for accounting reports. Research by Azmi et al. Grabfood is international company which actually specialized in ride service. Hence for Indonesian market they make several adjustments like having food delivery service and partnering with local fintech OVO for payment service. Many SME's are joint with grabfood, but prefer to use cash payment rather than using OVO. Due to those condition, sampling method used in this study is purposive which criteria for owner or manager of SME's food which listed in Grabfood In Purwokerto during May 2019 which accept OVO as their payment method.
Data are taken using questionnaire with 1-5 point likert scale questions. There are six construct and each of them is having 3 questions. The complete questions can be seen in Table 1. Data then analyzed using Partial Least Square (PLS). Data then analysis using WarpPLS. The procedures consist of two sections. First, testing the validity and reliability. Second, testing the models. Third, testing the hypothesis. The testing procedures will explain bellow.

Validity and Reliability Testing
There are validity and reliability testing for indicators and variables in this research. The results are as follows.

Validity Tests
Validity tests consist of convergent validity and discriminant validity. Validity convergent test results can be seen in Table 3. According to the test, loading factors value are more than 0.07 for all indicators. It means that all 19 indicators from 7 variables are meeting validity convergent criteria.     Table 6 show the results of model fit and quality indices. This can be concluded that this research model is fit and acceptable using all the quality indices criteria.  Figure 2 shows hypothesis testing results. The detail will be explained in Table 7.

Sources: Data Analysis
Hypothesis 1 is rejected. Compatibility has no effect on Intention To Use with beta 0.036 and p value 0.360 more than 0.05 two tails.
Hypothesis 2 is accepted. Compatibility has positive effect on Perceived Usefulness with beta 0.735 and p value 0.001 less than 0.05 two tail. This is consistent with Cheng (2014) study.
Hypothesis 3 is accepted. Compatibility has positive effect on Perceived Ease of Use with beta 0.423 and p value 0.001 less than 0.05 two tail. This is consistent with research by Cheng (2014).
Hypothesis 4 is accepted. Compatibility has positive effect on Perceived Enjoyment with beta 0.213 and p value 0.013 less than 0.05 two tail. This result is in line with Cheng (2014).
Hypothesis 5 is rejected. Perceived Ease of Use has no effect on Perceived Usefulness with beta 0.007 and p value 0.473 more than 0.05 two tail.
Hypothesis 6 is accepted. Perceived Ease of Use has positive effect on Perceived Enjoyment with beta 0.610 and p value 0.001 less than 0.05 two tail. This condition is in line with Cheng (2014) analysis.
Hypothesis 7 is accepted. Perceived Usefulness has positive effect on Intention to Use with beta 0.511 and p value 0.001 less than 0.05 two tail. This is consistent with previous researches by Cheng (2014) and Yen and Wu (2016), Chi (2018), also Riskinanto et al. (2019).
Hypothesis 8 is rejected. Perceived Ease of Use has no effect on Intention to Use with beta 0.140 and p value 0.075 more than 0.05 two tail.
Hypothesis 9 is accepted. Perceived Enjoyment has positive effect on Intention to Use with beta 0.363 and p value 0.001 less than 0.05 two tail. This result consistent with study by Venkatesh (2000) and Cheng (2014).

Personal Innovativeness moderates negatively the effect of Perceived Ease of Use on Intention To
Use with beta -0.193 and p value 0.023 less than 0.05 two tail, it means that hypothesis 10c is accepted.
Hence hypothesis 10a, b, and d is rejected. Personal Innovativeness do not moderating the effect of Compatibility on Intention To Use with beta 0.078 and p value 0.215 more than 0.05 two tail as in Hypothesis 10a. Personal Innovativeness do not moderating the effect of Perceived Usefulness on Intention To Use with beta -0.030 and p value 0.383 more than 0.05 two tail as predicted by Hypothesis 10b. Personal Innovativeness moderating the effect of Perceived Enjoyment on Intention To Use with beta -0.139 and p value 0.076 more than 0.05 two tail as stated in Hypothesis 10d. This is consistent with Agarwal andPrasad (1998), Cheng et al. (2014), Patel and Patel (2017), also Alalwan et al. (2018)  Overall results show that this study is consistent with Extended Technology Acceptance Model.
This study also shows that by using the new Financial Technology, SMEs is induced to make Financial Statements that comply with Accounting Standard. This is due to their needs to reconciliation and claims their income with Vendor. This also shows that during cashless era, accounting is needed most by enterprises, especially to whom they usually do not make it while they still rely on cash transaction.

Conclussion
Conclusion for this research is as follows. First, Compatibility has no effect on Intention to Use.

Limitation and Suggestions
There is several limitation of this research. First, this research is taking sample in the early of grabfood and financial technology booming in Indonesia that makes only few sample users that availables. Further research can be use larger samples and more locations to generalize the results.
Second, this research only limited in exploring the use of financial technology to induce enterprises to make good financial reports. Previous research should explore more whether the enterprises financial reports are self-prepared or helped by the other technological companies or consultant. In doing so, make use understand how technology can make small companies condition better or make additional inclusion to operates.